“You said that the authors of the safe school program were, quote, putting pedophilic garbage in our school curriculums. You said that?”
“Yep,’’ she replied.
Those are controversial views. UK politicians from mainstream parties would not say such things.
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/children-at-risk-from-predators-on-government-website-20150721-gihjgz.html
Through the Safe Schools Hub, students are given the opportunity to "find out about" homophobia, and coming out. When they click on the relevant page, they are taken to the websites of Youth Central, and the Safe Schools Coalition, as well as an associated site, Minus18, which describes itself as "Australia's largest network for LGBT youth".
Whatever else Minus18 is, it functions as an online dating site. Users register by answering questions such as age, sexual identity, outness, gender, location and preferences, and can search profiles of other members. Users can then connect online.
Carol Ronken of Bravehearts has looked carefully at the Minus18 website and issued the strong warning that "without appropriate oversight and administration, sex offenders can and will exploit these sites to target vulnerable youth".
Given this is a website aimed at teenagers younger than 18, there are no checks to ensure that users are of a similar age. A perusal of the profiles on the site suggests many of the users are aged between 14 and 16.
In spite of Minus18 supposedly having a rule that users over the age of 25 are not permitted to utilise the forums "without direct permission from Minus18" there are literally scores of users older than this on the website.
Minus18 does not enforce its own rules. When this was put to Tim Christadoulou, the Relationships Manager at Minus18, he stated that "rather than actively refuse registrations for certain age groups, we respond to individual profiles and users on a case-by-case basis".
Even this is dubious. Minus18 management was unable to answer how many users were refused registration in the past 12 months. That is particularly disturbing given some of the profiles from men aged 30 and over who seem to have an interest in underage users.
One 30-year-old man said he was looking for "fun fun fun" and described himself as "a man like a tiger nice". I don't know about a tiger, but he certainly seemed predatory. And lest there be any misunderstanding about his intentions, he provided a number of semi-naked photos to make it clear.
Another user was a 31-year-old secondary school teacher from Leichhardt in Sydney who was implausibly looking to network with other schools and youth organisations. One would have thought a simple Google search would have been easier.
And then there was the 36-year-old man from Birmingham, Alabama, who registered last month and was "into guys". I cannot imagine what reason a 36-year-old man from the United States would have joining a website full of teenagers in Australia, but it can't be a good one. Whatever it is, though, he helpfully provided a Facebook page and phone number.
In what way is what Deeming said controversial, given what she said is accurate? Do you think having safeguarding concerns based on the above information, shared by Bravehearts, is “controversial”?