The EI lead has made a suggestion but it excludes any sense that female patients have asked for this to meet their needs and basically sets the precedent for all future events, workshops for staff and patients having to erase biological reality.
This makes it sound even worse. So female patients have asked for this to meet their needs, and a non medical person is telling them it is not inclusive to ask for it. How would for instance, having an event about C sections, be in any way other than about women's health. its nuts. The fact that others, partners, what ever can attend shows that the intent isn't to be exclusionary.
So in terms of public relations for some word smith pen scribbled to presume to tell women something they have asked for isn't in their mind politically correct it totally bonkers.
I know OP doesn't want to escalate but would seriously think that HR or whoever should be asked to ensure that someone's professional area of work (the event organiser) is not undermined by some obscure, not univerally accepted set of beliefs.
And equally important as not to collude with snubbing female patients, is the fact that staff - who are the trained professionals - dont have to undermine and obscure their knowledge for someone who has no importance what so ever in the delivery of health care.
Surely some parts of the NHS are now aware that many, many people think this daft ideology has gone to far, and employers should not be imposing this on their (trained professional) employees.
Its outrageous.
And as on another thread implies that the employer is prioritising one set of beliefs (trans magic) over another set of beliefs (biological reality).
Do they want to end up being sued by a health professional saying they were blocked from doing their work in a professional and safe way by an ideologue?