Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Teacher Kevin Lister's court case starts today on Tribunal Tweets

190 replies

Imnobody4 · 19/03/2024 09:45

Kevin Lister, a maths teacher of 20 years, is taking New College Swindon to an employment tribunal alleging he was fired for not affirming a student's preferred pronouns.

https://twitter.com/tribunaltweets/status/1770010705019711637?t=46yG9nCCclvIz5b4-iq4cg&s=19

https://twitter.com/tribunaltweets/status/1770010705019711637?s=19&t=46yG9nCCclvIz5b4-iq4cg

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
EasternStandard · 29/03/2024 12:56

OldCrone · 29/03/2024 12:53

It also makes it impossible to challenge the apparent DBS overreach in getting involved and barring him as a threat to children. I suspect he was referred for refusing to follow management instructions involving a vulnerable student and they decided that warrants banning him.

This is from the judgment re the DBS barring.

5.133 The Respondent referred the Claimant to the Disclosure and Barring
Service (‘DBS’) on 13 January on the advice of the LADO [802-11]. He
was subsequently barred from participating in regulated activities with
children [836-9]. Within its reasoning, the DBS referred to the views that
he had expressed to it, which included that transgenderism was a ‘cult’
and that parents of children who transitioned ought to have been
“investigated for Munchausen by proxy - thus enforcing their beliefs.”

5.134 In relation to Student A, the DBS concluded that the Claimant’s conduct
had “caused emotional harm to a child”. It was concerned that, in the
future, “you would…impose your views onto a child, irrespective of their
choice, or whether your contributions… or invited by them. You would
likely have a serious lack of regard for how this would impact children in
your care.”

The second point could equally be applied to TRA teachers.

It could. Good point.

I’d like to see children safeguarded from those views

Signalbox · 29/03/2024 12:56

The second point could equally be applied to TRA teachers.

And should be IMO.

songaboutjam · 29/03/2024 13:04

Signalbox · 29/03/2024 12:56

The second point could equally be applied to TRA teachers.

And should be IMO.

Yup. I had a sociology teacher who used to get on her political soapbox and rant about the Tories. She was a die hard Corbynite, had clear bias on some of the material she taught and singled out students who disagreed with her. Concerningly, she was also qualified to teach RE.

I cannot fathom why teachers are not being pulled up on this more, unless it's simply that no one in the class ever reports them.

SaltPorridge · 29/03/2024 13:04

Taking part in Pride isn't the same as playing football. But when teenagers refused - in a stroppy teenage way - they weren't humiliated or spotlighted or treated to a tirade.

thirdfiddle · 29/03/2024 13:41

Taking part in Pride isn't the same as playing football. But when teenagers refused - in a stroppy teenage way - they weren't humiliated or spotlighted or treated to a tirade.
I suppose that's something, but I can't muster much gratitude that they 'only' set inappropriate tasks and disciplined students for objecting but at least the punishments meted out followed school discipline policy.

SaltPorridge · 29/03/2024 14:07

thirdfiddle · 29/03/2024 13:41

Taking part in Pride isn't the same as playing football. But when teenagers refused - in a stroppy teenage way - they weren't humiliated or spotlighted or treated to a tirade.
I suppose that's something, but I can't muster much gratitude that they 'only' set inappropriate tasks and disciplined students for objecting but at least the punishments meted out followed school discipline policy.

My post was replying to the suggestion that TRAs should lose their jobs. I suggest they would if they behaved like the complainant in this tribunal. I illustrate my point with a real-world example of TRA in a school to compare and contrast.
Is this school unusual in its promotion of Pride? Surprised that anyone would be shocked. This is the water we swim in.

northtower · 29/03/2024 14:34

@SaffronSpice I didn't say there was a set age for Gillick Competence. I said it was usually 13.

northtower · 29/03/2024 14:36

@Aloneinmanchester why are you trying to start an argument in an empty room?

At no point have I 'defended this idiot' not once. I've just challenged your incorrect statements on safeguarding and medical consent.

Perhaps you could talk some time to practice some reading comprehension before you go off half cocked?

thirdfiddle · 29/03/2024 14:52

Thanks, I understand your point better now SaltPorridge, though not sure of the parallel. Would an equivalent to your TRA case not be more if a teacher made students participate in a GC protest event and punished those who refused?
I suppose I shouldn't be shocked but I still am at what TRAs get away with. Our school at least mostly stick to the pride club, which is optional.

SaltPorridge · 29/03/2024 15:00

Yes something like that.

RedToothBrush · 29/03/2024 15:18

thirdfiddle · 29/03/2024 14:52

Thanks, I understand your point better now SaltPorridge, though not sure of the parallel. Would an equivalent to your TRA case not be more if a teacher made students participate in a GC protest event and punished those who refused?
I suppose I shouldn't be shocked but I still am at what TRAs get away with. Our school at least mostly stick to the pride club, which is optional.

Or was pressuring a lesbian by constantly saying are you sure you aren't trans.

DadJoke · 01/04/2024 10:29

@SaffronSpice Applying Lee vs Asher’s Baking Company Ltd to misgendering other employees is a real stretch, and doesn’t match other recent pronoun cases, nor does it appear to have been used as a precedent.

Obiter dicta are not legally binding but can be legally persuasive.

Signalbox · 01/04/2024 17:37

DadJoke · 01/04/2024 10:29

@SaffronSpice Applying Lee vs Asher’s Baking Company Ltd to misgendering other employees is a real stretch, and doesn’t match other recent pronoun cases, nor does it appear to have been used as a precedent.

Obiter dicta are not legally binding but can be legally persuasive.

The fact is there is no case law yet on whether or not you can compel people to use pronouns that are not sex-based?

TrainedByCatsToBeScathing · 01/04/2024 21:12

There are several take-aways for why this wasn’t the right case but the major one for me is good legal representation is essential and not just for their legal skills in court.

If someone is representing themselves we don’t know if a legal team would think it’s winnable which also means If someone is representing themselves we don’t know if they have been told it isn’t winnable and they are going ahead anyway. Since we can’t see the full details of the case and how their behaviour contributed to the problems they faced we don’t know whether it is one we should consider contributing to. KL was raising money towards expenses on gofundme, despite the way they treated Allison Bailey I feel more comfortable contributing via crowdjustice as you know there is a legal team involved.

I thought KL was naive to represent himself but I hadn’t considered he might have been arrogant enough to have be told it was unwinnable by a barrister experienced in GC cases and to pursue it anyway.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread