I think it's a bit disingenuous to say they're not male clothes though, they're female clothes- given the many references to masculinity and the participants referred to men's clothes.
So far as whether the clothes have male or female properties rather than the bodies they are in, it comes down to the signals being sent out- these are masculine clothes and styling.
Barracker made these points, which I think are pertinent.
Or is it mostly the association of that garment with a particular sex class that makes it appealing? If that sex class suddenly all rejected that garment en masse, does the appeal die too?
A shirt is a shirt. A jacket is a jacket. Do I like it because it looks phenomenal on me and fits my body like a dream, or does its value to me rise because it's an aesthetic that I associate with 'masculinity' or men?
It's not a style I would adopt but I find butch/ stud dressing interesting because it's tribal dressing and tribal dressing is always interesting. The effort put in is impressive. I have no idea if butch lesbians are "deeply invested in other women" beyond their immediate partners - or that there should be any expectation that they are.
I dont consider myself either butch or femme but am greatly adverse to wearing the costume of the dominant sex ie men
Have never understood why feminist lesbians dont see the contradiction
And in a sense reinforces gender stereo types
This seems a bit of an extreme reaction but I do query the assumption by most posters that butch lesbians are breaking gender stereotypes. The look only works because there are gender stereotypes about clothes.