On the risk assessment Rhona pointed out that even a male prisoner who had committed serious sexual offences against female prisoners would be transferred to the female estate as long as the offending wasn't recent. She did not specify what recent means.
So, it's possible that a violent rapist who has been locked up in a male estate and who therefore hadn't offended against women recently for lack of opportunity would have a good chance to be transferred.
As for the GRC, the male prisoners in the female estate that Rhona is discussing do not have one. Because the Scottish Prison service adopted a trans inclusion policy some years ago that is based on self-id. Without ever once considering what impact this might have on women.
This is why by the way the Scottish Government keeps on reassuring us quite earnestly that GRA reform that brings in self-id will not change the rights of prisoners who identify as trans. This gives the impression that this is because they have such robust policies in place that women are protected. In truth GRA reform changes nothing because the Scottish Prison service already operates on a self-id basis for inclusion in the female estate.
That females who identify as trans would not be safe in the male estate is acknowledged without any fuss btw. The cognitive dissonance should be staggering, but apparently not. It's all perfectly logical.
Males who say they are women are women and therefore should be in with female prisoners. Females who say they are men are men but for some weird reason they should not be in with male prisoners. I cannot possibly imagine what that reason might be...
Anyway, there is supposed to be a review of the policy this year and thanks to the valiant efforts of grassroots groups like forwomen.scot and Women and Girls in Scotland there is a chance that the needs and rights of female prisoners may be considered at long last. And someone as credible and as important as Rhona speaking out now gives these women a real chance of having their human rights upheld.