Yes actually you're right, Lass, I found that bit hard to relate to as well. But only personally - I have seen so many of my female friends go through the body-loathing and self discomfort that it does form part of the typical female experience for me. I think the main reason I haven't experienced it personally is because I have never struggled with my weight and because my mum never modelled being unhappy with her body and wasn't interested in fashion so we never had magazines etc around the house.
I also appreciate the point that I didn't say that I felt it summed up what it means to be a (biological) woman - I think I identify with it because it sums up how I feel about gender. That I started off believing trans was about a discomfort with one's bodily sex, and then the confusion comes in when people start talking about gender, because, to me, and to quote from the article:
"...of course, many of the things I like to do and wear are things that are typically aligned with womanhood. But I didn’t come to like those things in a cultural or social vacuum, but against a backdrop of powerful social messages about what kinds of things women ought to like, so it’s no surprise that I should come to like some of these things. And anyway, I don’t feel that these things reflect anything deep, essential or natural about my identity. They are just my tastes and preferences. Had I been raised in a different culture, I might have had different ones, but I would still have been basically the same person.
"Furthermore, just like all other persons, a lot of the stuff I like to do and to wear is not stuff that is stereotypically feminine. A lot of the things I like and enjoy are things that are usually regarded as masculine. Just like everybody else, I’m not a one-dimensional gender stereotype .... Even on those occasions when I consciously and deliberately participate in performing femininity, by wearing makeup or typically feminine clothes, I don’t see this as me expressing my gender identity; rather, I am conforming to...a socially constructed ideal of what woman is. And furthermore, once it’s decoupled from traditional, restrictive notions about what it is appropriate for people of different sexes to do, it’s not clear why it makes sense to call any of this stuff “gender”, as opposed to just “stuff I like” or “my personality”."
Emphasis mine. I cut out a couple of parts which I felt were unnecessary, I haven't changed the message. But this sums up for me how the two parts of the argument or discussion aren't really meeting in the middle, because they are on two totally different planes of existence.