Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Can I talk about men ?

140 replies

Blistory · 02/11/2014 12:54

In light of the recent threads and the perception that some feminists hate men, can anyone confirm that what they really feel about men as a class ? And whether they believe that feminism harms men ?

I see more disrespect for men on the general boards, the 'men just don't see dust', 'I'm as well doing it myself as he makes a mess of it' 'bless them, they just don't get it' 'women are naturally the better parent' types of threads. To be fair, those posts usually attract rightful condemnation but I can't understand why just because feminism demands more of men and expects more of men, feminism is seen as disrespectful or dismissive of men. Surely it's the opposite ?

In the interests of honesty, there are individual men I like, admire, love or respect. There are individual men whom I trust but it has to be said, not unreservedly.

Men, as a class, on the other hand, I fear. I fear the stranger in the dark alley, I fear the man driving the taxi, I fear the men attending conferences with me who decide to retire to their rooms at the same time. Not because I think they are definitely going to harm me but because I equally fear that if someone does harm me, I will be judged for not recognising the danger and protecting myself. This, I blame, not on men but on a patriarchial society that tells me men are predatory and women are victims. I blame it not on men but on a rape culture which reinforces the attitude that women are there for the taking. The only individual men I blame are the ones who rape, kill and assault but I start with the premise that those individual men are not identifiable to me therefore I should be cautious of all. Man hating ? I don't know.

In terms of feminism, I've always been quite comfortable with the idea that whilst not an aim, the accepted by product of feminism will be that men's lives are also enhanced. The prevailing notions that men have to be strong, assertive, to be the bread winner, emotionally detached, not to cry, to be able to physically protect themselves are all damaging to men, particularly those who don't conform to the stereotype. I firmly believe that while feminism seeks to break down barriers, the result of it will be that men also benefit significantly. And I welcome that. If feminism was simply about achieving a position for women that significantly put men in jeopardy, I wouldn't be supportive of it and I don't know many feminists who would.

Given that men who suffer under patriarchy will benefit from feminism, I see no need to actively campaign for men's rights so I'm entirely comfortable with focusing on women. For men who won't benefit, I'm sorry but I just can't shed any tears for someone who has had all the advantages and is now being asked simply to share them.

I've asked, not to be controversial, but because I didn't want to derail any existing threads that are, quite rightly, about putting women first. And I've been genuinely perturbed by the current threads that insist there is a genuine and strong sense of men being hated by some feminists on here. Is it just misunderstanding of language, a lack of understanding of feminism or am I so blinkered by my beliefs that I can't see it ?

OP posts:
Blistory · 02/11/2014 18:58

Typical, I start a thread about men and someone derails it by making it all about the women........

Ok, so MRAs are only a tiny part of the problem. Are you seriously arguing that feminists have brought it on themselves when they are considered to be man haters ?

OP posts:
Nojacketrequired · 02/11/2014 18:58

my first experience of realising that men hated women was at primary school and discovering that John Knox had written about how women....

Hmmm. This is where the disconnect comes for me. John Knox is a man.

My mum can't reverse park. The first time I saw that, I realised.....

Damsili · 02/11/2014 19:07

Not really, it all makes sense. The fact that you're pushing it as a response to what I've said before doesn't suggest to me that you've really understood my point though. (That sounds more aggressive than I mean it to).

My point is that if someone British was to read a forum of recently-arrived-to-the-UK Pakistanis and a great many posters referred to the British in the context of what Britain First were saying or were up to, it could lead to a notion that said Pakistanis were not terribly fond of the British - and unfairly so. The fact that the forum was regularly trolled by Britain First activists being incredibly aggressive and silencing would not detract from that first observation - Which is why you repeating what you said seems to suggest you think it would.

The fact is that most men are probably feminist-ally in their everyday attitudes and actions - even if they wouldn't necessarily recognise that they were or even think about it; most people just get on with their lives and don't spend a whole heck of time pondering matters of social politics. Life's pretty busy as it is. Yes, they may be complicit in certain ways with a system that supports problematic areas, but that's because we live in a patriarchy and everyone, men and women, generally just accept the general norms and values. These - both men's general decency and women's complicity in supporting patriarchy - are often ignored. I completely understand why that is, obviously. Rape, domestic violence etc etc need talking about - and isolated men can affect all women, as the recent bit of hashtag activism tried to tell us. But the question here is why are feminists sometimes seen as man-hating. My answer is that, from the outside looking in, the discourse is based around holding up the worst examples of male activity as representative - with only an occasional and cursory NAMALT thrown in as an after-thought.

Blistory · 02/11/2014 19:11

Nojacket, it wasn't a man writing a pamphlet that led me to that conclusion. It was an influential man who reflected certain views of his time, combined with the treatment of women including the ruling Queen of the time. All about context.

OP posts:
Damsili · 02/11/2014 19:15

Are you seriously arguing that feminists have brought it on themselves when they are considered to be man haters?

I love it when people critique a whole position by taking a single aspect away from its original context, change all the words such that it means something rather risible and then hold it up with Hmm. Love it. It aids discussion so much.

The answer to your question is no, I am not. Stop being so absolute.

PetulaGordino · 02/11/2014 19:18

i fully understand what you are saying. but what i am saying is that when feminists are talking about MRAs they are usually very careful to distinguish the actions of MRAs from those of men-as-a-class

Damsili · 02/11/2014 19:20

There are individual men whom I trust but it has to be said, not unreservedly

Are you seriously suggesting that all men are rapists?

Nojacketrequired · 02/11/2014 19:26

If you wish to state that priests 450 years ago had a dim view of women and their value, you will get no argument from me. Nor that those views were far more prevalent in the 16th century.

Damsili · 02/11/2014 19:29

I disagree Petula I think the forum is littered with phrases that will say society thinks x about women when what is actually meant is that the attitude can be found within society, but is by no means prevailing or without opposing attitudes. Additionally, it's usually inferred that attitude x is the sole responsibility of men and that women have no influence or complicity in it. Women as a class have less power in society, but they still have a great deal of influence - and feminism does too.

Enjoyingmycoffee1981 · 02/11/2014 19:32

men, as a class, I fear

I couldn't possibly lump in all men in a class and fear them. Not when I had the most wonderful loving amazing father, and I am married to a wonderful man, and my brother is bloody awesome too.

I think if you fear men as a class then you must have had some pretty poor pivotal men in your life. Am I right?

Damsili · 02/11/2014 19:40

This is on another thread right now. Just been posted:

Girls are taught to be compliant so men don't assault them.

So women never question men and just accept everything because if they do, they'll be physically attacked. Is this actually a dynamic that anyone can generally apply to their actual relationships with the men they live, work and socialise with? Of course not. It's a case of describing the general through the use of the specific.

Nojacketrequired · 02/11/2014 19:41

I couldn't possibly lump in all men in a class and fear them. Not when I had the most wonderful loving amazing father, and I am married to a wonderful man, and my brother is bloody awesome too.

One of the things I have noticed reading FWR is just how many regulars have accidentally stumbled upon such decent men and chosen them as life partners. Some of them did so long before they discovered feminism. What are the odds on that?

PetulaGordino · 02/11/2014 19:48

so how do you think we should talk about these things damsili? what language should we be using?

PacificWerewolf · 02/11/2014 19:48

I don't fear men as a class and I have never been frightened of them as a class or of an individual man (I realise I have been lucky. So far).

I do resent the privileges that men enjoy and there are things I don't do because I am female which I find quite Hmm myself but find to uncomfortable to change.

I have a loving father (who is a raging sexist, not so much misogynist - he does love women - but not for a moment thinks they are equal to men), lovely brother (who is probably more of a feminist than I am), a DH (who is a work in progress) and 4 sons I am hoping to raise as non-rapists.
I have been physically threatened by men in my line of work but have always felt in enough control to not be (too) afraid. I have also been threatened and assaulted by women btw which is just as horrible.

I think many of the more controversial posts are because many people struggle to look beyond the horizon of there own experiences. I find this quite tiresome at times tbh but I feel the same on some politics boards or anything else vaguely divisive.

PanIsNotAButterfly · 02/11/2014 19:51

Typical, I start a thread about men and someone derails it by making it all about the women........ lovely ironic/comedic comment there, and so unrecognised thus far! Like it.

PacificWerewolf · 02/11/2014 19:52
Grin
Blistory · 02/11/2014 19:59

Isn't the message generally that men are to be feared ? Isn't that we teach women by telling them to be cautious ?

A tiny minority of men are rapists but how do women identify them ? Or how do we get the message across that the risk is so small they don't need to identify them. Or maybe the risk isn't small.

My experiences of the men in my life are positive. But the guy on the train, the guy on the building site - well, them I don't know but why should I take the chance when my entire life has been peppered with the message of stranger danger particularly from men ?

OP posts:
Blistory · 02/11/2014 20:03

And no, Damsili, I didn't say that all men were rapists because that would be factually incorrect, wouldn't it.

OP posts:
Damsili · 02/11/2014 20:04

Does the validity of a problem's identification rely upon the same person coming up with a solution Petula? Grin

The OP was asking if people thought feminism harmed men (prior to going to to explain that she didn't really give a shit if it did) and query the idea of feminists being perceived as being man-haters.

To clarify, no I don't really think feminism does harm men and, when you consider the benefits that feminism brings, some marginal negative consequences can be excused. I have answered that I can understand why some people perceive feminists as man-hating and that those people are not exclusively MRAs (or historical equivalents). You can dismiss my opinion if you wish. You can also dismiss the opinion of everyone that dare suggest a negative perspective or consequence of feminism. Many feminists do do this, which I think is curious. Do we really think that there can be no flies in the ointment at all? Do we think positive change can be affected in society and there can't possibly be any adverse side-effects? This is a strange notion to me. I see no problem with believing that feminism is a great and positive force for good in the world whilst concurrently acknowledging that there may be things within the movement that aren't perfect or have (comparatively minor) negative consequences on society.

Damsili · 02/11/2014 20:06

I think you missed my little parody Blistory

PetulaGordino · 02/11/2014 20:14

i don't disagree with you on many of those points, i have my own criticisms of aspects of feminism and of individual feminists. my question was a genuine one, i'm not sure why you interpreted it otherwise - you had made some interesting points and i wanted to know how/if you felt these problems you had outlined could be resolved

museumum · 02/11/2014 20:17

I have a huge issue with the whole "men as a class" thing.
I hate the patriarcical system but I don't feel anything about "men as a class" because I think that is prejudice.
In relation to the "men as a class" kill women, oppress women, benefit from the patriarical system I always find myself thinking of my own situation as a white Western European. Yes I benefit from racism and colonialism but I don't believe I deserve to be hated for that even "as a class" rather than as an individual.
So I actually on a personal basis reject the "men as a class" terminology.

Damsili · 02/11/2014 20:32

Sorry Petula It's a perfectly fair question. Unfortunately I am required to go and watch Dr Who now - but I'm not ducking out of it and will come back.

Damsili · 02/11/2014 20:32

Tardis Literally.

Blistory · 02/11/2014 20:38

Missed your parody completely and missed the bit in my OP where I implied that I don't give a shit about men.

Just goes to show that we all read into posts what we read into them and there's no telling someone otherwise.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread