Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

US Republican ignorant of female biology. Again.

83 replies

TheDoctrineOfEnnis · 19/08/2012 22:17

www.salon.com/2012/08/19/todd_akin_legitimate_rape_stops_pregnancy/

Opening quote: ?First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape] is really rare,? Missouri Senate hopeful Todd Akin said in an interview Sunday, explaining why his ideal abortion ban wouldn?t include an exception for rape. ?If it?s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down,? he added.

Aargh! If he believes the rights of the fertilised egg trump the rights of the woman regardless of circumstances of conception, OK, that is his position. I completely disagree but at least it might be a consistent stance. But saying, yeah, well, it hardly ever happens anyway and if it does happen it's the woman's fault cos her body didn't stop it is just mind-bogglingly stupid.

I wish there was some kind of basic competence exam for would-be politicians.

OP posts:
StormGlass · 25/08/2012 12:12

IIRC, they were talking about the embryo's right to life, regardless of the mother's personal circumstances, health or the viability of the pregnancy. I don't recall them talking about any dangers to the mother.

The SPUC lecture was along the lines of:

"Pregnant due to rape? Not the baby's fault. Get it adopted if you don't want it.

Pregnant due to careless sex and can't cope with a baby? Not the baby's fault. Get it adopted if you don't want it.

You had a planned pregnancy and now scans show the baby will be horribly disabled and you don't know if you can cope with that? Well, you wanted the baby, so have it and just deal with it. If you can't deal with it, get it adopted.

You had a planned pregnancy and now scans show the baby will has xyz condition and hasn't got a chance of survival outside the womb? Well, what do doctors know. Maybe they're wrong. Do you really want to risk killing a baby if they're wrong?

You had a planned pregnancy and now the doctors say you should have an abortion because you've got xyz health condition and the pregnancy's likely to kill you? Well, that's just selfish. And the doctors might be wrong anyway. You should continue with the pregnancy, cross your fingers and hope for the best. "

Followed by touching stories of women who'd decided not to abort in the above circumstances and were very happy about their decision. Theyalso had graphic pictures of abortions.

I should state here that I'm pro-choice and believe that women should have the right to choose abortion. I believe that the rights of the person who already exists outweighs the rights of the embyro / foetus, at least up to the point where the baby can survive outside the womb.

confuddledDOTcom · 25/08/2012 13:24

I'm pro-life but I'm also pro-choice, my choice is life BUT can I say that if I was in any of those circumstances I wouldn't change my mind? Nope.

I reluctantly took MAP when I was raped, I was told it would harm the chances of the CPS taking it up if I didn't and our church councellor and minister both told me I should do it (councellor was lovely, spent an hour talking about having a baby wiith someone you love, our minister just said "what are you messing abuot for? Just take the thing!") I'm not sure if I would abort if I found out later on but I've never been in that situation to be able to judge. Things like health though, putting the unborn before my health and my living children's future or carrying an unhealthy baby and putting them through whatever it is, maybe a horrible death. A friend recently aborted because she was having a boy and boys in her family die a slow horrible death in childhood. At some point she has to watch her son die, does she do it nicely when he won't feel it or leave it until he's in a lot of pain? Someone once described it as at some point she would have to turn off life support, she decided it was kinder to make herself the life support she turned off. I'm just glad I don't have to be brave enough to make that decision because it's easy to say what you would or wouldn't do when you're not in that situation.

TheDoctrineOfEnnis · 25/08/2012 13:51

Confuddled I am so sorry both that you were raped and that you felt pushed into taking the MAP.

I would not advocate women who were raped being pushed into abortions, nor would I advocate taking away their choice to have one. Either could be right for different women..

OP posts:
confuddledDOTcom · 26/08/2012 00:20

Thank you. Everyone was lovely TBF and it was really the situation that forced me into it, knowing it would affect things with the CPS was a small part.

I had only ever thought of abortion/ MAP as being something bad and had never faced the reality of it in that situation, which is something the councellor helped me to work through, doesn't mean it was an easy decision but I saw it differently. It's a similar process in a way to what I had to work through when I divorced. I'd grown up thinking Christians don't so to be walking away from a marriage after 15 months wasn't easy and I had to go through a similar process of understanding that no it's not good but some times necessary.

Emphaticmaybe · 26/08/2012 22:27

Confuddled- I'm glad you got the support you needed.

Regarding the original post I'm never surprised by the crap spouted by American right-wing Christians, but I presume he is referring to the female body shutting down or delaying ovulation in response to a traumatic event which is biologically possible, though certainly not a conscious decision.

However any traumatic event post ovulation would have very little impact on fertilisation as it is the traumatic event in itself that delays the ovulation. Once pregnant the female body is very good at preserving an embryo regardless of personal wishes or emotional trauma - the exact opposite of what Todd Akin suggests.

Again a great example of twisting the truth to suit an argument and placing all responsibility for unwanted pregnancy on the woman - even in the most extreme context of rape.

What scares me is the amount of support this man must have had to get to the position of being elected to the senate, (or nearly) - that's an awful lot of people holding similar views - he has just been the one unwise enough to spout them publicly at a sensitive time. I have no doubt that Mitt Romney's personal views are pretty similar to Akin's (Romney's running mate Paul Ryan has been very vocal and very scary in his views) and this man could end up as the next president - yes very scary.

confuddledDOTcom · 27/08/2012 14:29

I read on one link that he said the female body secretes something that kills sperm of an attacker Confused

OneMoreChap · 27/08/2012 14:34

confuddledDOTcom Mon 27-Aug-12 14:29:54
I read on one link that he said the female body secretes something that kills sperm of an attacker

and this twat is a legislator?

confuddledDOTcom · 27/08/2012 14:53

Can you imagine if this was true? They'd be able to create the most natural form of hormonal contraception ever!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page