Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Extreme Male Brain

86 replies

StarshitTerrorise · 15/04/2012 14:52

Can anyone help me put an end to my DH's indoctrination on this matter?

ApParently it makes perfect sense but it sounds about as sensible as when the US started publishing 'evidence' that black people were intellectually inferior.

Many Tia!

OP posts:
ArthurPewty · 15/04/2012 16:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TheFallenMadonna · 15/04/2012 16:19

What does he say about it?

doctordwt · 15/04/2012 16:21

Yes. If he'd called them WankerBrain and DoormatBrain, then we'd know where we were.

doctordwt · 15/04/2012 16:22

Oh sorry OP, didn't answer your Q - ask him whether he thinks he's more WankerBrain or DoormatBrain? That might get him thinking over the more twatty elements of the hypothesis.

AliceHurled · 15/04/2012 16:22

was a webchat with Cordelia. Might help. Or google her debunking his work.

AliceHurled · 15/04/2012 16:24

FFS!

StarshitTerrorise · 15/04/2012 16:25

Thank you for the link to cordelia!

He doesn't say a lot except that it makes sense how the science is presented.
I told him that so did the research on higher domestic violence levels in working class families being linked to 'breeding', 'class' and 'IQ' but that was subsequently found to be bollocks too!

OP posts:
garlicnutter · 15/04/2012 16:28

"The E-S theory has been tested using the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and Systemizing Quotient (SQ), and generates 5 different 'brain types' depending on the presence or absence of discrepancies between their scores on E or S. E-S profiles show reliable sex differences in the general population (more females showing the profile E>S and more males showing the profile S>E).[1] "

"A final criticism is that people with autism may not match the description of being 'extreme males' because they are not more aggressive or more physically masculine than others. Again, this misunderstands the 'extreme male brain' theory which does not argue that people with autism show an extreme of all male traits (such as height, aggression, visuospatial skills, or muscularity) but only on E-S measures: below average cognitive empathy and intact or above average systemizing.

To date there are still too few studies of women with Asperger Syndrome (AS) but a recent cognitive study confirms this profile (PLOS-One, June 2011, Volume 6), that women with AS show elevated levels of a precursor of testosterone (androstenedione)[17] and show a different protein profile in relation to sex hormones[18]"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathizing%E2%80%93systemizing_theory#The_extreme_male_brain_theory_of_autism

I have no axe to grind on this: I come out in the 'average' range for females on these tests but have slightly elevated levels of testosterone for a woman. I also get slightly elevated scores on some autism-related behaviours. I don't know whether the two factors are related, but you have to remember theories like this are based on observation. Nobody's really claiming that gender dictates a certain kind of brain, only observing that more men have a certain type of brain and more women have another.
Also, it's a proportional test not an absolute.

TheFallenMadonna · 15/04/2012 16:28

He's a scientist?

He's read the literature? Are you wanting to question the methodology? The conclusions?

OneHandFlapping · 15/04/2012 16:29

I have partially skim read a paper by him on the subject here. And even to me it is evident he makes no allowance for nature vs nurture.

Maybe a baby is more likely to be displaying innate abilities, but when it comes to the sections on mens' career choices in science, IT and construction demonstrating the principal of extreme male brain, the discussion seems unscientific and subjective to me.

ElephantsAndMiasmas · 15/04/2012 16:33

I agree with you, Sharshit. It's like observing social trends and labelling going to university and becoming professionally qualified "white-type life" and expecting people not to be offended.

StarshitTerrorise · 15/04/2012 16:38

DH is an academic. Engineering.

He just read the book, which tbh I haven't.

I think I was hoping that there was a better book out there I could point him to if this subject is of interest to him.

Me, I studied psychology at under and post graduate level as well as education methodology and child development. I do not like the deterministic assumptions nor the implied acceptance of these supposed traits, even if found in adulthood being the 'natural' order.

OP posts:
AliceHurled · 15/04/2012 16:39

I'd point him to Cordelia Fine's book.

StarshitTerrorise · 15/04/2012 16:40

Onehand, I find it akin to suggesting that working class people are not as bright as middle class people and possibly using career choice as the 'evidence'.

OP posts:
CardgamesFTW · 15/04/2012 16:41

"Male brain" huh- Does that mean that us female aspies are actually transgender? All this time, and I didn't notice I was a man on the inside! Hmm

garlicnutter · 15/04/2012 16:41

OP: The end of the second paragraph in my quote gives you an aswer, I hope!

What this theory actually means is that "Extreme Male Brain" - that is, a brain with autistic characteristics - is average or above for systemising and below average for cognitive empathy. In claiming this label for himself, your husband says he is disabled when it comes to understanding other human beings. No more.

HTH Grin

StarshitTerrorise · 15/04/2012 16:43

But DH is great at understanding others, albeit lazy at times in acting upon it!

OP posts:
TheFallenMadonna · 15/04/2012 16:47

But he doesn't have an extreme type S brain...

But I bet it did ring true to him. DH is an engineer, and it spoke to him! Engineering is a perfect match for the description of systematising.

garlicnutter · 15/04/2012 16:47

They're not deterministic assumptions. They're observational.

When I worked in advertising, I made heavy use of a social profiling tool based on postcode. If I needed to advertise red pesto, for example, I'd find that Islington had a higher proportion of people who are likely to use pesto than, say, Merton. This doesn't indicate in any way that making pasta dishes at home makes you live in Islington, nor that living in Merton puts you off pesto. It simply says that a Islington residents are more likely to use pesto.

TheFallenMadonna · 15/04/2012 16:48

In fact, IIRC, one of the pieces of evidence he uses is based on performance in an engineering aptitude test. And one for Physics.

garlicnutter · 15/04/2012 16:49

Sounds like Mr Starshit is not only deluded, but wrong!

If he's a bit weak on systematising, that would explain why he misunderstood the theory Wink

StarshitTerrorise · 15/04/2012 16:52

They're deterministic in the belief that people are born with a brain one way or the other. The actual observational data in adulthood doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the natural make up of the brain.

OP posts:
StarshitTerrorise · 15/04/2012 16:53

And it's Dr Starshit Grin

OP posts:
Bluestocking · 15/04/2012 16:56

Only Dr? He needs to crank his Extremely Male Brain into high gear and get to Prof Starshit, pronto.

Swipe left for the next trending thread