Jamma, Trouble and Strife magazine ceased to publish 10 years ago and even then, it had a very small circulation. It was the antithesis of mainstream and certainly had extremely limited influence on public discourse at the time. I doubt its circulation was more than a couple hundred copies a pop. It's barely remembered now, so surely you could come up with something more recent to "prove" your claims that misandry (as a widespread threat to men) exists.
And, did you actually read Hilary McCollum's article? I don't know when it was originally published, but interestingly I remember a convo with her probably 15 years ago on some of the themes in this article - what the media chooses to report and not report, how the mainstream press chooses to portray perpetrators and victims of gender-based crimes depending on their perceived value (e.g. prostitutes, promiscuous women, unfaithful wives, etc. not as "worthy" of victim status as those seen as "innocent," and making excuses for male perpetrators of violence against women deemed "less than innocent.")
However, the flip side is the media portrayal of perpetrators who are "beyond the pale" as being uniquely evil, demonic, less than human, and men who sexually abuse children tend to fall into the category (unless they take the stand that it was "justified" because the child looked older, behaved provocatively, etc.)
One problem with this is it fails to recognise that most perpetrators of child sexual abuse don't have a special satanic appearance or behaviour. Something like 90% are parents, kinship carers, step parents, etc. and the vast majority are male. In other respects, they don't stand out from any crowd of ordinary men.
So, the media likes to focus on the small percentage of child sexual abusers who aren't related to or known to their victims and sets them up as icons of evil. At the same time, the media fails to give coverage to the vast majority of cases where the perpetrators were in a position of trust, often within the family, and not so easily portrayed as evil or demonic. And, it's not in the interest of the mainstream media to point out the threats to children, or to women, within the home and traditional family set up. So, the perpetrators of child sexual abuse we DO hear about tend to be portrayed as uniquely deviant, as aberrations.
There is absolutely NOTHING in that article that suggests that McCollum, Kelly or anyone believes that all men are evil, bad, abusers, paedophiles, etc. It does state that the media tends to either diminish the significance and gravity of male violence to women and children OR portrays those who fit the mould of "deviant" as being uniquely evil and inhuman, thus nothing like "normal humans" and something we don't need to worry about.
It also suggests that this is highly misleading because male sexual violence against women and children falls at one end of a continuum of male attitudes and behaviours that regard women and children as inferior to men. At least some sections of this continuum of attitudes and behaviours is if not overtly endorsed, at least not universally condemned by our society. And, the boundary between what is acceptable and not acceptable seems to be pretty variable and porous.