I have a question that relates to two recent threads so apologies for thread about a thread.
Allhailtheaubergine (hope you don't mind - it's your thread I'm referring to) said that she was worried when she walked on the beach and when a man came between her and her exit she became nervous.
Another poster in AIBU said she was unhappy about a male nursery worker taking her daughter to the bathroom.
The OP in AIBU was completely torn to bits over this. Allhail was given support and most people (including myself though I didn't post) agreed that they would have felt scared and validated her response.
Now my question is why is one response valid and rational and the other one not? Is it because one is a person in a job and the other could be "anybody?" I would imagine you're more likely to be attacked by someone in a job (ie taxi driver, gas man, builder or someone else you would invite into your home) than just some stranger off the street but I could well be wrong.
I suppose I was thinking that if one is a feminist issue then the other one must be too as they are both about a fear of men and what men can do to women.