Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Police "naming and shaming" sex workers

36 replies

DorotheaPlenticlew · 07/08/2010 20:36

I'm sorry to post and run, but I'm going to have to. Would very much like to find out what others think of this, though. To me, it seems very misguided.

link to the Guardian

OP posts:
Aitch · 08/08/2010 12:58

there's a campaign up here to criminalise men who use prostitutes rather than prostitutes themselves, haven't heard anything about it for a while... wonder how theyy're getting on?

tethersend · 08/08/2010 12:59

Do you think the government will intervene over this issue in order to defend the civil liberties of the women involved, claig?

ElephantsAndMiasmas · 08/08/2010 13:05

Thank Maud for that. I have been racking my brains to wonder why no-one has succeeded in doing this before - have people tried?

claig · 08/08/2010 13:06

I hope they will intervene, because I think it is wrong. Maybe there is also a pressure group that could challenge this using human rights legislation. It seems to me that it is a form of intimidation. They want to discourage prostitution by threatening to expose the prostitutes. I think they should have more police on the streets and make more arrests. They know where it takes place, so they should take other action to stop it, such as arresting more punters.

tethersend · 08/08/2010 13:08

I agree. I will wait to see if they do, but I think it unlikely.

ElephantsAndMiasmas · 08/08/2010 13:09

That campaign website is strong stuff: www.endprostitutionnow.org/myths-and-facts/job-description-.aspx

Is there a thread about this?

Aitch · 08/08/2010 13:11

we discussed it when it launched, pre-feminist topic. i know some of the people who wrote campaign, it's cool, huh? know they've been busy with other stuff in meantime, must ask them how this is going esp in light of the squirmy 'sex work is different' job centre ruling.

ISNT · 08/08/2010 14:29

I thought that the law had already changed to criminalise the punters?

Aitch · 08/08/2010 14:32
  • Home
    • Time for change o Introduction o Other countries positions + Introduction + England and Wales + Sweden + Iceland + Finland + The Netherlands + USA + New Zealand
    • Myths and facts o Introduction o 10 Myths o Job Description
    • Support the campaign o Support us o Our supporters
    • Latest News o Glasgow calls for an end to prostitution now o Latest coverage o Prostitution in the News
    • Case Studies
    • Campaign materials
    • Links and Resources
    • Contact Us

England and Wales

* Home
* Time for change
* Other countries positions
* England and Wales

yup, in england and wales. how does that square with this photos thing?

"Section 14 of the recently enacted Policing and Crime Act 2009 creates an offence of paying for sexual services of a prostitute who has been exploited or subjected to force by someone else. It is a strict liability offence whereby it is irrelevant whether the person who pays for sex is, or ought to be aware that the prostitute has been exploited. The offence is punishable by a fine of up to £1000. The hope is that the creation of this offence will reduce the demand for sexual services and therefore help address the exploitation and trafficking of women and children etc.

Although this is clearly a step in the right direction, we want to go further than this in Scotland and offer legislation which will protect those involved in all kinds of prostitution."

Aitch · 08/08/2010 14:32

whoops, sorry, didn't realise that list had copied through as well.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread