Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

Original poster

The Salt Path

65 replies

Sadcafe · 17/05/2025 12:20

Anyone read it and is it a good read

OP posts:
proximalhumerous · 04/06/2025 15:27

5foot5 · 04/06/2025 09:51

I guess they must have edited out a lot of the packing up and setting off for another day's walking in the final cut then.

Show quote history

Good to know they took my comments on board!

GoldenSpraint · 06/07/2025 10:57

Seems she embezzled her employer, and that's what escalated to them losing the house. No wonder lots of it didn't ring true.

observer.co.uk/news/national/article/the-real-salt-path-how-the-couple-behind-a-bestseller-left-a-trail-of-debt-and-deceit

YellowGrey · 06/07/2025 10:59

This is shocking!

TooExtraImmatureCheddar · 06/07/2025 13:28

Wow. I do wonder why none of this has come out before - the film producers are going to look very silly.

minnienono · 06/07/2025 13:29

And crucially changed her name - no due diligence seems to have been done

MarvellousMonsters · 06/07/2025 13:37

This hasn’t aged well….

DoorOpening · 06/07/2025 13:40

I haven’t read it or seen it, but it’s interesting how many of you picked up on the lack of credibility!

HardbackPaperback · 06/07/2025 13:47

minnienono · 06/07/2025 13:29

And crucially changed her name - no due diligence seems to have been done

No ‘due diligence’ is done by publishers on memoirs. Their legal team will only have been concerned with whether a potential case for defamation could be brought against them. The investigative journalist who researched the Observer article had to provide facts because she needed to prove a serious allegation of theft against Sally Walker, but no publisher is going to have asked to see copies of Tim Walker’s medical records, for instance, or court transcripts. Their defence would probably be that the main concern of the book was the actual walk, and that this had actually happened.

There have of course been famous examples of previous ‘fake memoirs’, where publishers have offered refunds to customers who could prove they bought the book before the revelations, and hence under false pretences. It may mean that future memoirs will be fact-checked where possible, or with the legal rider that this book is ‘substantially based on real events’ or such.

Zov · 06/07/2025 13:48

Oh dear. Blush #awkward

jjeoreo · 06/07/2025 22:12

SirChenjins · 21/05/2025 18:32

I gave up a few chapters in. The couple were ridiculous and quite frankly, deserved everything they got through their sheer stupidity - to the extent I started to doubt it was a true story.

This comment has aged very well! Kudos to you!

GlomOfNit · 07/07/2025 00:07

Daysofcake · 26/05/2025 17:40

^^This - I started reading it after a friend gave it to me, saying she had found it incredibly sad and moving. They started to really annoy me, though — the beginning didn’t quite ring true. DP is a lawyer and said the legal situation (with the judge not accepting the evidence in time), would be very unlikely to have happened in the way she presents it. I couldn’t find any real life evidence of the case, either, which would normally be around in the public domain, so I concluded that her name must be a pseudonym, because there’s no trace of her unless connected to the book publication. (Try it — it’s impossible to find out any corroborating evidence about them in real life beyond the book publicity!)

The whole time in the book they seemed to regard themselves as a special case who should be allowed to do things like nick stuff, trespass, wild camp etc. just because they were middle class people in a tight spot! I had to abandon it 2/3 of the way through!

Show quote history

This is so prescient! And that it rang so untrue for you that you tried to look them up for corroboration and ... couldn't find any mention of them aside from book publicity.

Digitalhen · 13/07/2025 10:37

Daysofcake · 26/05/2025 17:40

^^This - I started reading it after a friend gave it to me, saying she had found it incredibly sad and moving. They started to really annoy me, though — the beginning didn’t quite ring true. DP is a lawyer and said the legal situation (with the judge not accepting the evidence in time), would be very unlikely to have happened in the way she presents it. I couldn’t find any real life evidence of the case, either, which would normally be around in the public domain, so I concluded that her name must be a pseudonym, because there’s no trace of her unless connected to the book publication. (Try it — it’s impossible to find out any corroborating evidence about them in real life beyond the book publicity!)

The whole time in the book they seemed to regard themselves as a special case who should be allowed to do things like nick stuff, trespass, wild camp etc. just because they were middle class people in a tight spot! I had to abandon it 2/3 of the way through!

Show quote history

Very perceptive considering the last week’s worth of news re: this couple and their ‘story’ 🙌

GoldenSpraint · 13/07/2025 10:43

https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/moth-told-me-he-was-dying-when-a-doctor-had-said-his-brain-scan-was-normal

And now the man they were renting from has said Moth told him he had been given a couple of months to live!

What a lot of lies this couple have told!

Original poster
Sadcafe · 13/07/2025 19:47

Well I never did buy it , with everything that has come to light recently, I’m glad I didn’t

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page