- The Messalina Of The Suburbs: E.M. Delafield.
I read this on Kindle for the 'Rather Dated' bookclub.
This book is based on a crime committed in the early 1920s by Edith Thompson and Frederick Bywaters, a British couple executed for the murder of Edith's husband, Percy. Their case became a cause célèbre and while Frederick wielded the knife, Edith was executed alongside him for being complicit in her husband's death despite convincing evidence. Her relatives have sought a pardon even as recently as last year to acknowledge the severity of the judgement that was prejudiced against her.
The Messalina of the title refers to Valeria Messalina of Ancient Rome, third wife of Claudius, a powerful and promiscuous woman who allegedly conspired against her husband and was executed on the discovery of the plot. Written in 1924, the Messalina of Delafield's book is Elsie, a averagely attractive girl who discovers that at sixteen, she exerts a powerful magnetic sexual appeal over men that she can use to her advantage.
Elsie lives a miserable, poky existence with her mother and her unfortunate sister Geraldine of the recurring bilious complaints. Her mother runs a boarding house which involves too much work for the lazy Elsie but at least brings her into contact with interesting house guests. This does not work out for the best as Elsie gets involved with an older man who offers her an escape from her stultifying existence but she only ends up in a worse situation. It isn't any surprise that things are not going to work out well.
I thought this book sounded promising but fell short of being an excellent read for various reasons. I thought it was one dimensional and not nuanced in the least. The characters, both men and women, are thoroughly unpleasant and because the men are only after One Thing (speaking euphemistically in 1920's terms!) it's very odd and sordid in places.
The language itself is stagey and stilted, particularly at the beginning of the book. The dialogue between characters improves as the book goes on but it comes across as a bad amateur theatrical performance, particularly at the start. Perhaps this is how people did speak at that time, but it struck me as exaggerated and it made characters into caricatures of themselves. I think there was too much repetitive description as well.
Elsie is an unlikeable character and is portrayed as a helpless, hysterical young woman. Unimaginative, unintelligent and powerless to intervene and change her destiny. I'm not sure Delafield did the real-life Edith any favour in the book. She was sympathetic to her and it's important to consider the book in the context of its time. It was no doubt forward-thinking for those times to delve into female psychology. It's easy to be critical.
I'll save my other thoughts for the discussion on the other thread. I've been mainly negative in my review here, but I still thought it was an absorbing read even if it was a flawed one.