Catching up on Women’s Prize longlist reviews:
- Trespasses, Louise Kennedy 5/5
Much reviewed on this thread already. This tender story of an extramarital affair set in 1970s Belfast is my favourite novel on the longlist. The characters are utterly believable from the beginning. I particularly enjoyed the conversations between the heroine and her alcoholic mother; they seemed so real. I saw a clip this week where Kennedy was being interviewed by Waterstone’s, and she cited three other novels that influenced her when she was writing Trespasses: Annie Ernaux’s
Passion simple, Greene’s
The End of the Affair, and Iris Murdoch’s
The Black Prince, which was shortlisted for the 1973 Booker Prize. Interesting. I’m particularly taken with the Kennedy/Ernaux connection, but I also remember loving
The End of the Affair.
- Fire Rush, Jacqueline Crooks 4/5
This novel really deserves to make the shortlist IMO. The story is gripping, and the language is extremely inventive. The distinctive style imitates both Jamaican patois, and the musicality of the environment it describes: the underground raves and dub reggae happening in 1970s London. I’m extremely ignorant of this musical tradition so I think the full effect of the language was lost on me, but I admired the novel and the voice of its female protagonist anyway.
- Bandit Queens, Parini Shroff 4/5
A fast-moving, entertaining read, with a cluster of complex (and not always sympathetic) female characters at its centre. The Indian setting was very vivid. I read some reviews suggesting that the India depicted was one that fit too easily into the stereotypes of Western readers, and I suspect this is true to at least some extent. Some of the women’s conversations sound like American/Californian slang (and made me laugh for that reason, for example when the women are reiterating that motherhood, you know, is always just SO fulfilling). Anyway, the plot and writing style are quite distinctive, and even though the violence reaches disturbing levels in places, comedy and satire predominate.
- I’m a Fan, Sheena Patel 4/5
This wasn’t exactly an easy read, because it’s short but very dark. However, it’s certainly thought-provoking. It paints a convincing picture of what infatuation and obsession can look like, with reflections on colonialism and racial inequality mixed in. The shallow discourse of wealthy instagrammers is skewered very effectively. It’s hard to sympathise with the narrator on one level though, because the man she is obsessed with is so self-centred and disengaged. We’re told he’s a famous artist, but we never see any evidence of his talent, only of his selfishness and passivity.
- Dog of the North, Elizabeth McKenzie 3/5
Quirky, whimsical, fun. The heroine is caring but hapless, and I enjoyed the California setting. On the other hand, the plot seemed to peter out a little toward the end rather than reaching a kind of resolution.
- Memphis, Tara Stringfellow, 3/5
The concept of this book (a multi-generational saga set in the city of Memphis) is promising, but personally I found the novel a bit underwhelming. It felt very Hollywood-like, with some lurid bits and some glamourous ones. The story is told from the perspective of three women of different generations, but their voices were quite similar (as someone else on these threads observed). The novel itself aside, I was put off by discovering about how badly the author responded to online readers who criticised her book (I’m reminded of the Kate Clanchy Goodreads saga here). The tone of her defence was troublingly immature (‘I’m in Italy, draped in Gucci and drinking aperol spritz!’). More confirmation of the fact that trying to squelch negative reader reviews is an enterprise fraught with peril, and can make an author end up looking worse.