-
To Paradise by Hanya Yanagihara
Having previously thought well of both A Little Life and The People In The Trees (despite their complex and dark subject matter) reading her newest felt like a no brainer. I believe it was @Stokey who didn't get on with this and warned me last year. The plot defies description but I am going to try. It's set in New York, but it's not "our" New York. The civil war was lost and the territory we know as the United States is split into about 6 countries.
(This is never, not once, relevant so why make a point of it?)
So there are 3 sections :
In Washington Square we meet wealthy heir David Bingham in the late 19th Century. In this alternate past, same sex marriage is on equal terms with straight marriage and David is awaiting a marriage offer, just as Charles comes forward, David is taken in by a confidence trickster.
I could imagine this as a whole book, it was engaging enough but I felt that it wrote itself a bit predictably and throughout felt something was lacking
In Lipo-Wao-Nahele which is set in and around the 1990s, David is dating Charles, who owns a big house in Washington Square. They are having a farewell party for Peter who is dying of AIDS. This is juxtaposed against the story of Kawika (meaning David) David's father, in Hawaii and his struggles around trying to preserve indigenous culture. Kawika ends up in the thrall of a man sharing a name with the confidence trickster from Part One (Basically all names and surnames are recycled across sections)
This section, particularly the Hawaiian part, was so boring I nearly DNFd but I'd come too far. Real eyes glazing stuff.
In Zone Eight we are introduced to a future New York, 2090s and a totalitarian state. Humanity has been ravaged by multiple pandemics, Charlie is newly married and working in a lab when she meets a stranger named David.
This section is juxtaposed against a one sided correspondence beginning in the 2040s between Charlie's grandfather Charles and his British friend Peter. It tells the story of Charles' marriage to Nathaniel and their troubled son David.
This is probably the best written section of the book. I enjoyed both Charlie's point of view, and the epistolary part. But it wasn't enough...
Usually when a book is a challenge, you can, at least find something to admire but not here. Despite it being very readable prose-wise all sections have serious flaws and weaknesses. As a whole work, it's not very good to the point of being pointless, the postmodern stuff with the names and everyone being descendant is just eyeroll worthy. It's hugely convoluted, nothing works, there's no satisfying moment where it all comes together. Pretentious doesn't really cover it, it has to be read to be believed
TLDR : Too many Davids
A ghastly disappointment