Meg - I thought The Bone Clocks was an inferior copy of the author's masterpiece Cloud Atlas. Here is my review from 2014:
-
The Bone Clocks - David Mitchell
I liked it and was definitely gripped by it, but I am not in awe of this book like I was of Mitchell's Cloud Atlas. Yet, there are many similarities between these two books, to the point that this one feels like an imitation of Cloud Atlas:
- 6 stories
- ... all of which are first-person accounts
- ... spanning decades
- ... starting in the past (1984) and extending far in the future (2043)
- ... and ending on a roll rather than winding down, as if they were cut prematurely
The themes are similar, too:
- Man's selfishness & cruelty, especially towards each other
- The yearning for safeguarding our knowledge/self/experiences for posterity
- Growing old
- Dystopian future
Cloud Atlas was original, gripping, and well... perfect
First halves of the stories marched towards an inevitable conclusion, with the dystopian and post-apocalyptic two feeling incredibly real. Then came the second halves, and the reader is locked into the epic ensemble, with no escape from the author's logic as shown over and over in a variety of ways across continents and centuries. People are cruel and exploitive, we kill and enslave when we can; we have not changed, will never change, and this will be our downfall. Our technology will disappear in a single generation, just like our experiences and memories do as we grow old and die. It is a powerful blow to the gut, made all the more painful because of the hopeful note it ends with (1st story, so 1850s... but the reader already knows how the human story will end
because the last story was laid out in full in the middle of the book).
A similar theme plays out in The Bone Clocks in a similar format, but in a less effective way imho and for it I blame its fantastical/supernatural subplot of warring immortals. I'm not quite sure why the author has felt the need for this subplot, especially since it takes up almost 25% of the book and doesn't add much to it while the other 5 narratives take up between 14%-17%. I will think a bit more about this and post my thoughts on here. If you read this book, please do the same. It would be interesting to see what you think.
There is a lot I want to say but I don't want to give any spoilers. Suffice it to say that David Mitchell is a brilliant author and he knows it. He is a master storyteller who (1) manages to change his 'voice' with every character he is voicing the inner thoughts of and make the personal accounts feel truly individual, (2) keeps you hanging on every word (I hear this book is 600+ pages - seriously didn't feel like it), and (3) succeed at every level, be it the feelings and perceptions of a child or sweeping predictions about life half a century in the future.