I'm always interested in what turns people off. I found both
The Goldfinch and
Mantel's Cromwell books extremely good but too long. I found
Girl on the Train had a great set-up which propelled me through the first part, but by the second half, it dragged and then morphed into something slightly fantastical (if not contrived) - the affair, the deception, the baby's death etc. Also, you could tell it was written by an inexperienced writer.
Oliphant ditto.
You before me double ditto.
50 shades was great for what it was meant to be, though not my cup of char. Ishiguro is an interesting one: love his writing, some of his books are my favourite ever (
Never let me go ), others were lacking so much in 'heart' is the best way I can put it (
Remains of the Day ). His pull-back style certainly leaves the reader emotionally distant from the characters.
I think overall I can love a book that is well written but lacking somewhat in plot ( Girl with a pearl earring, The light between oceans ). I can enjoy but not love a plot-y book that lacks big style ( Thursday Murder Club ). It's a rare book that combines both and I count We need to talk about Kevin as one that does.
Then come the books of ideas that either turn me on or off. Hated the idea behind Life of Pi, loved I saw a Man.
On books that I simply hated: Eileen by Ottessa Moshfegh has to be up at the top. Well written, in its way, but getting into the heads of the most awful characters - I couldn't bear to finish it.