It's been a while since we've had a good Station 11 bunfight 
"I like my science fiction with the emphasis on the fiction, including the feeeelings."
Nothing wrong with feelings as such, but it's annoying when they are what the author relies on to sell a SF book that pathetically lacks any real world building - "Let's tug on some heart strings and have some female characters who go on about their feeeeeliiiingsss, and see the female audience (who just wants to read chick-lit as the whole world knows
) lap it up and push it into the bestseller lists." It annoys me to no end.
"If I want to read science, I'll read non-fiction science books, and I do - there is some wonderful science writing out there. I'll drink my water and my whiskey separately, thank you."
Likewise, I like reading non-fiction science books (notably about Quantum Mechanics and pure mathematics) when I want to learn about scientific topics.
I don't read SF to learn about science but the underlying science still has to make sense. If not, the book doesn't make sense. Station 11 failed in this and in other aspects as well, which meant that it made no sense at all. A viral disease that becomes symptomatic in a few hours is not only impossible (as is obvious who knows anything about how viral infections and human immune system function) is the easiest disease in the history of the world to contain and eradicate, especially if it kills in 24 hours. You just make sure that people remain indoors for 1 day & isolate those who don't.
The post-apocalyptic world rings completely false, as well. All of it falls apart too quickly, and the author has given no thought to what such a world of few survivors would actually be like. "Schools" where kids are taught about the lost world and its comforts made me laugh. Surely, you would try to preserve knowledge of math, chemistry, physics, biology etc rather than stories of past comforts.
And the people left alive somehow manage to find food, shelter, and clean water very easily which leaves them free to procrastinate and whine all day long. It's quite funny actually, and most probably worlds apart from what would really happen - what DOES happen wherever civilisation breaks down anywhere in the world due to war, natural disaster etc.
I'm not saying that every SF should be a scientific text book but a minimum level of scientific accuracy, rational thought, and consistency is required to create good SF. Otherwise it's just stupid.