Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

What we're reading

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

What are the worst books you've read this year?

198 replies

JiltedJohnsJulie · 28/09/2012 13:51

Having read the What is the best book you've read this year? thread I was wondering what the worst book you've read so far in 2012 is?

Mine would have to be either 50 Shades or Before I Go to Sleep.

OP posts:
YokoOhNo · 10/10/2012 13:27

Another vote for the Hare With The Amber Eyes. Utter, utter drivel and very pretentiously written. I bought it as my 3 in a "3 for 2" book offer. Couldn't finish it. The author's massive conceit at his own artistic and intellectual superiority to the reader irritated me too much.

ShellyBobbs · 10/10/2012 13:45

Yoko You just made me chuckle at your description of the author, I want to read it now to see how bad they actually are Grin.

YokoOhNo · 10/10/2012 14:33

Shellybobbs - don't buy THWTAE and line the man's pockets Grin. I'd give you my copy gratis, but I probably let the dog maul it or gave it away.

ShellyBobbs · 10/10/2012 15:45

I'll put it on my kindle wish list so I can check if it's free anytime Grin Probably ended up in a charity bag like all my rubbish books do.

duchesse · 10/10/2012 15:50

When will there be good news?, by Kate Atkinson. The answer is "never".

1.5 days I will never get back.

PostBellumBugsy · 10/10/2012 15:57

Another vote for The Hare With Amber Eyes - bought on the recommendation by a friend & I really struggled with it. Just seemed like one long "Oh look at my interesting family" brag fest. Not nearly enough stuff about netsuke, which would have been interesting.

Shagmundfreud · 10/10/2012 16:00

One Day made me ANGRY.

Greyhound (Kindle) made me a bit cross too, because it could have been a good book, but because it lacked the hand of a very good editor it was an undisciplined mess.

evilgiraffe · 10/10/2012 16:01

Heh, I read 50 shades two years ago when it was still just fanfiction. It is indeed pretty dire, but that's okay when it's a new chapter every week and you're doing it for fun. Trying to pretend it's good quality literature is both foolish and embarrassing.

The worst book I've read this year is The Strange Affair of Spring-Heeled Jack. It sounded so promising but was in fact tripe.

TunipTheVegemal · 10/10/2012 16:03

Mine was probably a recent Philippa Gregory, The White Queen. I used to really like her but she's got boring lately.

Shagmundfreud · 10/10/2012 16:04

The best book I've read in the last...oh... 2 years... is 'One Half of A Yellow Sun'.

Really, really recommend to everyone. I couldn't stop thinking about this book after finishing it.

Vagaceratops · 10/10/2012 16:06

The Boleyn Inheritance by Phillipa Gregory.

LastMangoInParis · 10/10/2012 17:56

Am starting to recall THWAE...

Booker nomination a couple of years back? Poe-faced Newsnight, Culture Show, C4 News-type presenters waffling gutterally?

I think it's starting to appear through the swirling mists.

Am sort of curious to give it a go now I know it's wound so many people up, though. As with all likely 'meh'-candidate books, I shall only purchase if available from Oxfam. (Am a bit excited now! Smile)

LastMangoInParis · 10/10/2012 18:00

'Half of a Yellow Sun'
Ooh, yes! Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie is one amazingly talented writer whose work stands out a mile. Just brilliant all round.

BigBoPeep · 10/10/2012 19:14

pillars of the earth. ugh. as a woman it offended me - what's all that bit where tom builder's apparently beloved wife dies and ellen jumps his bones straight after because he's just so desirable Hmm, and he's of course fine with that. Then the Aliena/Jack sex scenes...I dunno, I could just tell it was a man writing as a woman and it was pants. Aside from the main story being sooo boring. I found it unbelievable that Jak gave sh*t about building churches after tom builder died.

CoteDAzur · 10/10/2012 19:33

LastMango - "the fact that someone didn't like a book that you consider 'good' doesn't necessarily mean that they didn't understand it."

Liking/not liking is personal taste and nobody can object to it.

I was thinking more in the line of those who say "It is a crap book, complete rubbish" etc about books that have won awards, for example. Would you not agree that it is likely that these people haven't understood the book, rather than a widely acclaimed book being complete rubbish?

That thread on Cloud Atlas, for example, is the result of one too many such remarks ("Worst book I ever read", "Rubbish", "Crap book" etc) about that book. On one of these "worst book" threads, I said something about there being lots in that book that people may be missing, and OP took me up on my offer to write down what I got from it.

LastMangoInParis · 10/10/2012 23:14

I was thinking more in the line of those who say "It is a crap book, complete rubbish" etc about books that have won awards, for example. Would you not agree that it is likely that these people haven't understood the book, rather than a widely acclaimed book being complete rubbish?

Hmmm.... It's possible, of course.

But I'd be quite pissed off if someone tried telling me that the reason I dislike the writing of, say, Edward St Aubyn or Justin Cartwright is that I haven't understood it. I know that this writing is overrated, that it's of the same quality as much run-of-the-mill chick-lit of the sort that has mild literary pretensions. (You know the sort of stuff I mean: generally produced by glossy mag journalists with a bit of education, a reasonable turn of phrase now and again, but not a great deal to say.) But for some reason it's trumpeted as outstanding writing. Which it just is not.

Generally, if I don't enjoy a book, then I'll accept that:
a) It's the wrong time for me to read it. It doesn't resonante with me at this point, or I don't have the time to put in the hours and energy to 'connect' with it.
(That might sound really wanky. But still...)

Generally I'm happy to take this approach with more challenging literature.

Alternatively:
b) The book is a crock of shite.

e.g 50SOG, etc.

Don't know if you've read The Slap, Cote.

Before I read it I was under the impression that it would be quite an interesting, well written book. Quite a lot of media discussion of it presented it as such. But it's shit. Just shit.

What am I trying to say Confused Wine
Um...
I think the Cloud Atlas thread is a great idea.
Could be a good idea to start similar threads about any book, I guess, particularly if it's not written to a convention that lots of readers with be familiar with.

But I really baulk at telling people they haven't understood a book.
This is probably going to sound condescending to someone, in some way, but I think if people want to go back and re-assess a book then they should do that in their own time, without being told to.

CoteDAzur · 11/10/2012 08:51

I hear you re "wrong time to read". If I had tried Ian McEwan in my 20s, I would probably find it boring and pointless. Nearing 40, I found him incredibly insightful, peering into people's inner worlds with an eerie clarity.

Still, people come on here and say he is a terrible writer, his books are drivel, etc. it is not unreasonable to say they just don't get his books (yet?), possibly because it's not yet the right time for them.

CoteDAzur · 11/10/2012 08:52

I haven't read The Slap (generally try to stay away from hyped new books) and unlikely to read it after this thread Grin

NicknameTaken · 11/10/2012 09:36

I agree with mango that if I dislike lauded books, it's not necessarily because I failed to understand them.

Anthony Burgess criticized Jane Austen's work for lacking a "strong male thrust". Now personally, I dislike a strong male thrust in my literature. I'm sure there's an extended metaphor in there about liking different things in bed (or wherever) and liking different things in books. Books are often about chemistry between author and reader.

YokoOhNo · 11/10/2012 09:55

I'd be rather irritated if someone told me I did not understand a (in their opinion) great work of writing because i'd offered up my opinion that it was turgid drivel.

I liked the Time Traveler's Wife, which seems to be pretty divisive on MN, but lots of people didn't click with it. Several people loved The Hare With The Amber Eyes, which I thought was condescending pants. I'm pretty sure I understood it though Hmm.

In THWTAE was the high falutin' tone of the uber-aesthete who was writing it that grated and I gave up about 20 pages from the end - "I am considerably more refined than yow!". It could have been a remarkable human story interwoven with art history, but I thought all the dreamy prose was over written.

NicknameTaken · 11/10/2012 09:59

The Hare - I liked the bits about his uncle in Japan. I dislike the turgid Hapsburg architecture of Vienna, and I dislike ponderous prose about that architecture even more. It was an exciting story rendered dull by the heaviness of the prose.

Anste · 11/10/2012 10:03

Oh I'm so glad some people think Fifty Shades is awful. I too have skipped loads of pages to try and get to the 'good bits,' to no avail. I just don't like the style of writing and was bored out of my tree. Friends tell me to 'bear with it, the second book is better!!' Well life's a bit short and I'd rather read books I enjoy.

TheFlumpsHaveEyes · 11/10/2012 10:10

50 Shades was by far the most shit book I've read - probably ever.

I'm still annoyed at myself for being herded into downloading it like a sad little sheep, despite thinking the free sample was crap Confused

YokoOhNo · 11/10/2012 10:10

NicknameTaken - yes, exactly!

Chocberry · 11/10/2012 18:20

The wicked girls by Alex Marwood, it's the first book ever that I have gave up pn a quarter of the way through. Bored me to tears and could not waste any more precious time on it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread