I am LOLing at the idea that a health visitor can look at my baby and tell me to ignore guidelines based on extensive studies and the evidence of squads of researchers involving many thousands of babies.
'Too many rules and regs' about feeding babies these days, says Whoosh. Huh? There's only one, as far as I can see: 'Exclusive breastfeeding recommended for the first 6 months (26 weeks) of an infant's life as it provides all the nutrients a baby needs' (from the DH leaflet).
Can we clear something up, too? Lets get away from the World Health organisation telling mothers weaning before 6 months is dangerous. The WHO speak to governments, not indivdual women, and their research and guidance are for governments to consult, to develop policies consistent with public health. So it's a question of enabling women to breastfeed to 6 mths, rather than telling them to. Out of date HVs do not 'enable' at all.
The US, Australia, Canada, Scandinavia, all of Europe and the UK (and probably other countries, too, but I don't have the info) have the same recommendations - 6 mths excl bf.
This is because we see the best health outcomes when this happens.
Individual babies may need individual management - but they won't get it from HVs who are still parrotting 4-6 months as if nothing had changed.