I think people have been a bit harsh on minxofmancunia and I can see why she felt the need to defend her profession - I feel it too when all teachers are labelled as mean/ lazy/ whatever.I think that CAMHS workers, like any profession, are made up of a mixture of good, excellent and bad - but we can't generalise about all of them!
HIDTL, I'm sorry that there wasn't more clarity as a result of the appointment, but it's great that the doctor will see ds more and investigate a little deeper.
I think that people slating the psych in this case is a bit OTT. Why would every child with possible SN have a full multi-disciplinary assessment? That can't be the way it works, or the system would collapse. The way it seems to work is that there's an initial appointment, where some initial impressions will be discussed. The guy didn't say no SN. He said that he thinks there's no SN. That's his first impression, just like J's psych's first impression was that he was autistic, but then had to follow that up with months of interviews/ questionnaires and then the ADOS before drawing a final conclusion.
I think it's right not to rush into a wrong dx or even a right dx unless that dx is being withheld for dodgy reasons e.g. politics or funding.
The problem is that CAMHS see a lot of parents who aren't like us. By that I mean that we obviously care about our kids and think about our parenting and put our children first, or we wouldn't be on here! But there are some parents, who I see in work each day and MOMancunia clearly sees too, who want every excuse not to take responsibility (or let their kids take responsibility) for their kids' behaviour. They want an excuse. It sounds very Daily Mail, I know, and I'm sorry, but it is true.
There are other parents who want a dx for other reasons: financial, social services, to fight an exclusion... I didn't believe it until I met them when I began teaching. I thought it was something made up by people who didn't believe in SN or SEN. But it's true (and very sad).
There are other parents who become convinced that (normal) behaviour that their child shows (which is not something that their niece/ neighbour/ other dc did) must be SN, perhaps because of something they've read or heard even.
And so CAMHS have to be careful. A label sticks. When this is the right label, it's good. If not, it's very wrong, especially for the child. CAMHS have to make sure that they investigate carefully. Who are we to dx HIDTL's son? We haven't met him. Most staff at CAMHS are very well trained and experienced, so I am guessing that this doctor (who'd met him) knows more than we do, even if we are experts in ASD in our own rights.
Sometimes being a parent can cloud our judgement and the internet can make us think that we know more about SN than the doctors. IME, the doctors know more than me. I never ever guessed that J was autistic and the psychiatrist spotted it the first time she met him! So how can I say that parents know more than doctors? Well, we definitely know more about our own kids, and about life with SN. But they have to be trusted until there's a reason not to, I think, and I don't get any alarm bells ringing from the description of this appointment. Sounds like he's got a hunch and is going to investigate cautiously and with an open mind.
Good luck, HIDTL, and yes - make that SALT appointment and OT appointment via a GP referral.