After a big battle ds1 had SALT put in parts 2 and 3 of the statement. Then his SALT went on maternity leave- I have repeatedly informed the LEA that his private SALT is available to go into school, and they have repeaetedly said that they will (as in some unspecified time in the future) fund her to go into school.
He now has received no SALT input since Feb or March- I can check. Anyway spoke to the BIG boss in the LEA 2 weeks ago who assured me that a letter would be sent this week confirming that the private SALT can go in. Nothing.
I am ready to blow. DS1 probably has the highest need of SALT of any child in the authority who attends mainstream school. He has the language ability of a 12- 18 MONTH old. In addition to this he has a speech disorder. Even in the UK SALTS recommend that children wth his speech disorder receive at least 1 session, preferably 3 of SALT a week (from a SALT).
So am going to write a letter (copied to the MP and councillors- as I have had general contact with them regarding the lack of maternity cover- so I want them to hear our individual case). There is really no excuse as the usual excuse of "we can't get anyone" doesn't apply in our case.
Soooooo question is- what's the legal position for parts 2 and 3 of statements not being met- just want to know what I can threaten them with- is it tribunal or judicial review?
Will point out in monetary terms that if he doesn't develop at least good receptve language skills he will never live independently or even semi-independently so will end up costing them more. We moved down here over 2 years ago and in that time he has had 16 hours and 50 minutes of SALT time (not all contact time). A year ago BIBIC recommended that he needed and intensive 6 week course so that his difficulties could be accurately assessed - that has not happened.