Hi ChocolateisHeaven1. Excellent NN! Welcome to the thread, you are in precisely the right place and asking all the right questions
. There's lots going on in you posts (understandably) so I'll let you know how it's all worked out for us (similar position).
DD2 has asymetric bilateral spastic CP. So she's has high tone on both sides, but one side is affected more. She is 2 years 9 months and has only just started some unsupported walking for short distances.
DD2 has a Statement of Educational Need. I applied for a Statutory Assessment direct to the LEA (parental application) and the LEA then ask for reports from each of the professionals involved with the child. So for DD2 that was the Paed, SaLT, OT, Physio, Portage and Child Psychologist. Neither one of these independently support or 'reject' the application for a Statement, they only report on their professional aspect of the child's abilities and difficulties. It is for the LEA to decide whether a Statement is required. It makes me so cross that your Paed said that your DS 'won't get a statement' - it's (a) not his call and (b) he is incorrect in his assertion that a physical disability alone is insufficient to 'qualify' for a statement. So ignore everyone and apply for a Statutory Assessment
. Don't wait for the new system to kick in, go ahead and apply under the current system. (New system might be delayed, might have teething difficulties etc, and there is no need to wait any longer
). Our DD2 has 1:1 provision in her Statement and it went through in standard timescale (6 months?) without one hitch. I recommend the IPSEA guide to help you with your application, here:
www.ipsea.org.uk/What-you-need-to-know/SEN/Statutory-assessment.aspx
Next, funding stuff. I refuse to get drawn into discussing funding with any of the professionals or agencies, and to be honest nobody has really wanted to discuss this with us either! DD2 needs a certain level of additional support (as declared by the LEA on her Statement) to enable her to access the eduction that she is entitled to. How the 'authorities' work together to enable that to happen, and how they fund it is outside of my interest, so long as DD2 is being correctly supported. In our case, the nursery applied (after seeking my approval, which of course I gave) through the Birth-to-Five service (possibly called something else in your County) and based on her statement, the Birth-to-Five service agreed to fund the staffing to allow the nursery to provide the 1:1 provision for 15 hours/per week (15 hours being the full time early years provision). I still pay the nursery the normal nursery fee like everyone else, but unlike all the other kids, DD2's Key worker, supports her on a 1:1 basis. I suspect our Birth-to-Five funding is the same as Everysilverlining's Early Years Funding. Our Birth-to-Five service fund term time only, but I have an excellent nursery who are happy to cover to holiday's for us. Linky to our Birth-to-Five service, so you can perhaps find similar in your area:
www.birthtofive.org.uk
Next, having a child with a disability(s) does cost more. You shouldn't be covering the cost of enabling your DS to access his RIGHT to early years education over and above the costs associated for an NT child. Yes, I think that would be discrimination. But additional costs come from car journey's to therapy appts, paying for hospital parking, buying adapted bikes, sledges etc. And for this reason you need to apply for Disability Living Allowance (DLA) if you have not already done so. DLA would also help if you wanted to reduce your work hours to help support your DS. A guide to eligibility criteria and application form at this link, here:
www.gov.uk/disability-living-allowance-children
Additionally, depending on the number of hours you work, you may also be entitled to Carer's Allowance. You'll see links for Carer's Allowance from the page linked above.
You re spright about fighting for everything. It's rubbish because we as the 'end-user/consumer' of the service have to become experts in all this stuff just to ensure our right to access what we are entitled to is upheld
. In saying that, I've found the provision in Lincolnshire to be superb, and talking to others on this thread and seeing other comments in the main SN:Children topic, I think Lincs are absolutely marvellous in comparison. I'm going to stop there as I've rambled on enough in this post
. Lots of reading for you, but come back for more chat and advice if needed. Sorry if any of that was teaching you to suck eggs…..
