I've been trying to avoid this for ages, but the sticky won't go away and so I can't resist replying.
I've spent some time in the living hell that is developing new programme ideas, and this has all the hallmarks of the kind of idea which everyone thinks sounds great because MN is so popular and it is bound to do really well and so on and so forth, and which almost always turns out to be a real turkey. Mainly because people get so excited about the connection (MN in this case, could be a celebrity presenter, oh lets do something with that Geldof girl because every teenager wants to be her...) and doesn't actually think about the programme until it's way too far down the line.
A parenting advice programme is, realistically, only going to be of interest to a very small segment of the population at any one time. Does your child have eating problems? That's probably one in a hundred of the possible audience. And some of them will be out or watching Eastenders. So, you need something more to make people watch it.
There are several options for this kind of programme:
One is a decent format - i.e. a way of creating cliffhangers which actually keep you watching to the end because you care about the people and want to know what happens in the end.
Another is compelling on-screen presenters - no one really watched How Clean Is Your House for the cleaning tips after about week two, it was all about the presenters, along with reason three which is...
The other is the delight in feeling better about yourself, one way or another. How Clean works because you feel that at least you don't live in a slum and there is a voyeuristic fascination in seeing people who do. In a slightly different way, Motorway Cops does so well because there is a huge satisfaction to be had from seeing those smug aggressive drivers you meet on the roads actually being pulled over and done for it.
As things stand, I can't see that the MN tv proposal has any of these things going for it.
And it's hard to imagine how the MN experience (!) could or would translate into tv. Or indeed why it should, really. I remember sitting in a tv office when texting was The Next Big Thing, next to a load of people working out how to get texts into a show. There were several attempts, they all bombed. Just because it's cool, it doesn't automatically make good tv.
Finally, I also really wonder whether a show like this can fit in with the MN ethos. It is very, very rare for contributors to a tv show like this not to be exploited, or exaggerated, or at very least produced to look worse than they are. Or to get a reward from the show which adequately repays their contribution. So should MN really be doing all of this to its contributors/members?