Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

I keep wanting to 'like' posts on here a la facebook

118 replies

suwoo · 09/04/2011 16:40

Is there any way this could happen? Or not.

It would be great, but I suspect it wouldnt be possible on this forum template (I have no idea of correct terminology).

It drives me mad that I keep going to press like and it aint there.

OP posts:
lawnimp · 23/07/2011 21:19

oh god just seen mn's post considering this, really don't mn it's not mn it just isn't

MrsTerryPratchett · 24/07/2011 02:12

"So you'd want it vetoed even if lots of others were in favour of such a facility, I assume.

Not even willing to accept a trial of such a facility?"

I assume that was to me. I like MN the way it is so no, I wouldn't want to see it. I think that is the essence of having an opinion. Although I could just agree with everyone else. Having a like button would really help with agreeing with everyone actually. Baa baa. Maybe that is why I don't like the idea.

NetworkGuy · 25/07/2011 07:40

I'm of the opinion that most on MN are not just sheep, so the 'baa baa' comment is rather negative of others, but that's perhaps because you are equating the ability to 'like' (and I suggest also being able to 'dislike' for balance) as being only for those who are thick and/or juvenile. Well, maybe it doesn't suit your views, but there are many who would like the option, and until MNHQ has commented in the negative, it seems they are willing to look at this.

While I've seen comments suggesting a 'like' button could replace discussion, I suspect there are sufficient numbers of people who have opinions and will continue to write them when they feel the need (and have the time).

People have lurked rather than posted for weeks and months (you must have seen the "this is the first time I've posted, but been on MN x years") and if being able to just agree (or disagree) with a specific post draws those people on to the next stage, I see it as a benefit.

lawnimp - MNHQ has been making changes every few weeks for as long as I can remember, whether it is to change headings, add facilities (like bookmarks, colour choices) or change links and searching (well, they've broken that for a bit!), along with changes for users of mobile phones.

It is unrealistic to assume you will have the same facilities this time next year as you have today, and much of the time, people on MN are the ones suggesting changes... Personally I don't use Facebook or Twitter, so the links MNHQ has added are of little value to me, but clearly they felt it made life easier for users, and this is just another suggestion.

This has come up more than once with different groups expressing interest at different times, so it's hardly a recent suggestion for the sake of it.

As you can see, the thread is some months old, and sadly MNHQ has not yet come back to this, so with a bit of luck the extra posts will draw this thread to their attention once again!

HelenMumsnet · 25/07/2011 17:32

Hello all. And many apologies for our silence - it wasn't intentional. And we hadn't forgotten about it - just forgotten to update you. Blush

Anyhoo, yes, we do think this is a good idea - although we can see that it's not something everyone may want.

So, we're working on a way to make it an optional/customisable thang. We'll let you know when it's ready to roll...

NetworkGuy · 25/07/2011 18:18

Thanks for the update. Good to get some positive feedback.

NetworkGuy · 04/08/2011 10:34

Bump! Anyone making plans behind the scenes, please, MNHQ ?

I think we should be told !!

:)

RustyBear · 04/08/2011 10:45

Thing is, making it customisable is a bit pointless, because the objectors are those who feel it will change the dynamic of Mumsnet in a bad way. They are not saying 'Don't have a like button because I don't want to use it', they are saying 'Don't have a like button because I don't want other people to use it'

(I have no strong opinions on a like button one way or the other, by the way, I just don't want Tech to waste time on pointless customisation when he could be working on making the topic list stay alphabetical if you want it that way )

NetworkGuy · 04/08/2011 10:59

I know there must be plenty on the list (such as bug showing you new mail when you have read it) but this "like" (+ "dislike") request has been repeated and this is the first time I've seen MNHQ actually respond and consider it - so (a) I will be reminding them until there's some firm response (and I don't mean being banned from MN!) and (b) since they have added customisation for colours and various other aspects, asking for it s part of the request, rather than as an afterthought 2 months afterwards, makes sense in efficient software updates, rather than getting them to mess with the code again, later, when it can be done first time around!

NetworkGuy · 04/08/2011 11:00

s/for it s part/for it as part

RustyBear · 04/08/2011 11:29

Actually, I do have strong opinions on a dislike button - even FB doesn't have one of those - it would be a horrible thing to have and totally against all that MN stands for - why on earth do you want to make it easy for somebody to be nasty?

As for the customisation of a like button, what would it do? Presumably just show or not show the 'likes', so pretty much just cosmetic...

NetworkGuy · 04/08/2011 11:55

It is far less nasty to indicate dislike of the content of a post (not the poster) by flagging a 'thumbs down' view than some of the vitriol which one can see most weeks of the year !

I think it would make clear when someone had made an outrageous comment (without really nasty, and subsequently deleted, comments being made).

Customisation might include not showing comments with more than (say) 10 'thumbs down' marks!

RustyBear · 04/08/2011 12:10

Yes, but there would inevitably be far more 'dislikes' than people bothering to post nasty comments and it could get very upsetting for a vulnerable new poster who probably wouldn't know how to customise out the dislikes - and if you think it would just be used to indicate dislike of the content rather than the poster, you seem surprisingly naive...

NetworkGuy · 04/08/2011 12:16

If you can point to some discussion board where it has been abused in that way, I'll take that as serious, but I don't believe it so highly likely (and if there is concern it would be used that way, the default could be defined not to show 'thumbs up'/'thumbs down' at all, nor ignore any posts, given some posters are unwilling to entertain the option, so would probably prefer not to see any such facility).

RustyBear · 04/08/2011 12:27

Oddly enough, I don't actually spend my entire life analysing discussion boards, but I think MN is sufficiently different from most that such a comparison would be useless anyway. For one thing, it has a higher profile than most and a dislike button would give bored trolls a field day to just come on and click dislike. As I said, even Facebook doesn't have one, despite campaigns to add one, so why would MN ?

CaptainNancy · 04/08/2011 12:33

A 'like' button is pandering to the lowest common denominator.

MN is a discussion site- clicking buttons does not add to a discussion, it limits it.

MarshaBrady · 04/08/2011 12:36

Gawd don't. Keep it separate from facebook stuff.

NetworkGuy · 04/08/2011 12:51

I have no knowledge of why Facebook has none, but on other discussion boards (from newspapers to the BBC) comments can be given the thumbs up or thumbs down.

Yes, MN is a discussion board, but (as has been indicated repeatedly) there are problems with commenting just to say "I agree" - in some cases that's all one wants to add, but to explain whose post (and when, lest they put some controversial views over in a subsequent post) makes the simple "I agree" post unlikely (and some could argue, adds little to the discussion).

I see the ability to acknowledge views one (dis)agrees with as a stepping stone to making comments (among those who eventually post and explain they've been lurking for months or years). Those who are vociferous will continue to argue their corner, so I dismiss the view CN, that it will limit discussion - anyone with points to add will still make them.

Incidentally, just because FB was mentioned by the original poster, it is hardly a site that should solely be used in arguments against adopting this suggestion - I suspect that there are many on MN who never touch Twitter or Facebook but would still like to be able to give a fast indication of their views on some posting, but will still go on to add their two-penneth to the discussion.

Seems to regularly guarantee a few who say "Oh No!" (fx Ruth in The Archers) but sadly nobody from MNHQ sees this thread without a poke with a big stick.... someone, anyone, at MNHQ, are you awake???

:)

NetworkGuy · 18/09/2011 22:57

MNHQ - please can you rescue this thread from oblivion !

You showed a little interest several months ago but don't seem to look at it any more, or you look but never comment...

New posts on this thread. Refresh page