Allotment mum - I am really intrigued by your dd's timetable. If they are only doing 2 hrs each of Maths/English/Science/MFL and no humanities. What on earth are they doing with all the rest of the time?
I agree completely that 1 hr a week of MFL is a complete waste of time. You might as well not bother doing a language IMO.
ds1 is in yr8. He has 30 (50 min) lessons a week, which break down as follows:
4 English
4 Maths
4 Science
3 MFL
5 Humanities (2 history, 1 geog, 1 RE, 1 citizenship)
5 Arts (1 music, 1 art, 2 dance, 1 drama)
2 PE
1 IT
2 Tech (on a carousel)
I know our local Academy has a radical new curriculum, which I don't like at all. At the end of yr7 I wrote to ds1's school to say what a fantastic year ds1 had had, and how much he'd benefited from having traditional academic subjects taught by subject specialists. In your position I would write a letter to school to express your concerns, but only to possibly make a difference for future students. It won't make a difference to your dd.
In the Academy they have the following curriculum (25 1 hr lessons) in yr7:
2 English
2 Maths
2 Science
2 PE
1 PSHE
1 IT
5 Zone A (Humanities, MFL, English) - project-based learning, "competencies curriculum"
5 Zone B (Science, Maths, Tech)
5 Zone C (Art, Music, Drama, IT)
So many subjects are not delivered by subject specialists and the focus is on acquiring "skills for learning" rather than academic study.