Christmas is coming and I've had to neglect my thread. This has generated some quite interesting comments and responding to them directly would have been difficult/messy, but they haven't been forsaken. Sorry this a bit long, but it takes some of them in..
My "war" means fighting the premise that some extrovert stereotype is the pinnacle of human perfection and all children can be like that if only they would stop being lazy and made an effort. That is pernicious nonsense built on a casual, ignorant assumption that behavioural traits are largely a personal or parenting choice as opposed being influenced by genes and peers with parenting in a poor third place. The reality is that there is a strong biological component and to borrow DisappointedIdealist’s phrase (from the title of an excellent blog on mindsets) some seem intent on “Telling Penguins to Flap Harder”.
Introvert is a dodgy, dichotomous label we apply to a broad church, but DD will do some quite scary social things. Three times in the last year she has put herself in a lonely solo spot-light in front of a hall full of hundreds of parents. Unlike any of the local extroverts which is interesting, although ‘solo’ might be significant. These occasions were for reading, singing and playing a musical instrument respectively and although that public aspect was very hard for her and there were lots of pre-flight nerves, she reigns them in and reliably pulls off that kind of thing. So no huge problems here, but we’re still left with the classroom.
Another reality is that most of us deploy different variants of our personailty for different social scenarios. The DD we see at home can be very talkative and persuasive, a bit like some debating club champion, but that’s not the DD they see at school because she adapts her behaviour for a quite different set of social forces. It’s quite common to mock it, but there can be quite a lot of substance in ”Well they’re not like that at home!”
I’ve had years of occasional discussions with at-home DD about in-class DD and she’s been remarkably open and thoughtful in those. The latter actually encompasses part of the problem because if you ask her a "thinky" question then she has what I can only call a compulsion genuinely think about it, work the angles until personally content with the answer. DD is anything but slow, but the way she tells it the tempo of questions in the classroom rarely provides enough time for that little process and she just won’t submit the first thing that pops into her head.
It doesn’t stop there because she also works the angles on the teacher i.e. how an opinion answer may play with what she knows of their character. Then there are angles for her peers e.g. who else is beginning to put their hand up, whether they do that lots or rarely, the chance of one of their answers being a good one, whether her answer might make some of them think she’s "boasting" etc. She hasn’t talked about doing all of those together at the same time, but it’s clear to me that DD just doesn’t just get on and put her hand up without considering many other potential effects.
When I first saw the word "sensitive" in a sentence about introverts I assumed it meant "fragile child who cries a lot" and dismissed it as lightweight life-style twaddle that didn’t apply to outwardly stoic DD. By-and-by it turned out that they mean more sensitive to all their environmental input and that definitely fits. DD takes in and considers a bit too much, especially the other people effects, but an apparent consequence is that she is quietly very popular (not to be confused with skirt hemline and inch below knickers popular). Everyone’s friend. Quite a few children should resent her because she’s relatively good at lots of things, but all that considering and reserve seems to have removed her from the fray. Mess with aspects of her in-class behaviour and that may well change for the worse, so I’d rather it was left well alone.
If it ain’t broke…