@AudacityOfHope
Sorry to answer separately, I'll forget what I'm answering otherwise.
"It's also unclear how the weighting of the 4 harms was done"
Basically we had an online platform where every single concern, idea, etc we discussed was put up. We then had one week to go in and rate each problem in terms of how it would impact the four harms (some things might tackle all four a bit, or only one, or a few, for example) and rate the potential levers or solution in the same way.
That's how they came up with how 'important' we rated the four harms. But in actuality it went like this:
Covid 9.7
Societal impact 7.6
Other health 7
Economic 6.5
It wasn't that we sat down and went 'well, the economy is on two-thirds as important' it's more that's what was reflected in the problem and solutions we ended up discussing I guess. It was more organic than deliberate and that's just how it shook out.
Ah, thanks! I'm being a bit thick, though... Can you give an example of a "concern" or an "idea" or a "problem" or a "potential lever" or a "solution" ? They all seem very different things! So someone may have a "concern" about catching covid and being unable to care for a relative - but that in itself doesn't really impact on the 4 harms (though it would encompass direct and indirect health harm, economic and social harm) - so I assume you're talking about different kinds of concerns.
I'm just having difficulty visualising the kind of thing you were asked to do.
I can see that, for example, allowing children in schools could be perceived to exacerbate covid spread in the community potentially, hence making the direct impact from covid worse, but would decrease social harm (loss of education, loss of friendships and social skills, loss of women in the workforce increasing sex inequality etc) and economic harm (parents not being able to work due to childcare, families becoming poorer etc) and likely other indirect health harm (mental health, for example, though some may also be concerned about the increase in cases leading to increased hospitalisations and therefore reducing treatment of other health conditions) - but I can't picture how all of these things were weighted (and surely that's not within the expertise of the 19 of you anyway?!)