Thank you, @PseudoBadger, for kicking off this long, long series of Archers threads.
All views on The Archers welcome here! New blood welcomed. We don't all agree on all points and most of us are posting tongue in cheek a lot of the time, so don't worry about revealing that you would be delighted to be given a goldfish named after your ex, or other unusual views.
Spoilers: not on this thread, please. We don't wait for the omnibus to discuss the weeknight episodes, but we do try our best to avoid cross-contamination from www.mumsnet.com/Talk/radio_addicts/4197199--The-Archers-spoilers-thread-6-Cant-wait-for-7-02pm-Join-us-here, where spoilers are positively welcomed!
For newer listeners, lurkers or those who just have no idea what we're talking about, @DadDadDad has created this useful thread: //www.mumsnet.com/Talk/radio_addicts/3557323-For-Archers-fans-a-guide-to-acronyms-on-the-long-running-discussion-threads-and-any-other-meta-thread-questions-you-may-have - BOOP point for him! (See thread for explanation.)
Apologies for ignoring the various title suggestions on the last thread. However, here they are, plus a couple of other pithy observations, to kickstart the new thread. I think it's fair to say nobody is looking on this as a Golden Era! Goldfish Era, though ...
@Roysnewshirt: Everyone wants more! Chris wants more Amy; Jazzer wants more Tracey; Alice wants more time with Martha and Amy wants more space… Very true. And now we know Kirsty wants more farming expertise in the rewilding project, but not Pip (thank the lord) so does that mean approaching Adam? Currently under-employed.
@LillianGish: I tune in to hear birdsong and bleating in the English countryside not hammy acting and suggestive grunting.
@stilldumdedumming: Archers is good at the dynamics of family, farming, what it means to have your job, your home and your inheritance so closely aligned etc etc not this nonsense!
@DoctorTwo: Like fuck would Pheobe buy her parents a goldfish each. The Ambridge character transplant fairy has been working overtime this past few weeks, it's been absolutely fucking appalling bar a couple of exceptions.
Can't disagree with any of that. I want to hear more about the pigs and any other effects of Brexit. A topical insert about the war in Ukraine must surely be on the way.
Any happy listeners out there? Any disgruntled listeners with even more grumbles? Over to you!
Discuss your favourite podcast, radio show or The Archers episode.
Radio/podcast addicts
🐠 Archers thread #135: An Everyday Story of Fishy Folk. Discuss The Archers here.
Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 14/03/2022 12:04
Luculentus · 05/05/2022 21:47
The problem, though, is not just who has a valid claim but whether you open yourself up to the risk of weaker claims. For instance, if there is a disproportionate number of men getting bonuses compared to women, or vice versa. Initially at least, it didn't sound like they were operating any sort of criteria other than people Oliver vouched for - and he wanted to give Tracy a bonus not because she deserved it but because he felt bad for her, which isn't really the sort of reasoning that would stand up in a tribunal. Even once Adil had actually had a look at employment records all that seemed to add to the criteria was "we won't give bonuses where their bloopers have found their way into their file".
KimikosNightmare · 05/05/2022 20:22
It would only be discriminatory if there was discrimination. If Ian gets a discretionary bonus and Kathy didn't, that would be, but not giving Tracey one isn't.
Luculentus · 05/05/2022 18:17
Isn't it dodgy employment practice to decide to give bonuses to a favoured few redundant employees? Surely it's a hostage to fortune unless you can show a completely open, clear selection process so that there is no possible hint of any type of discrimination.
KimikosNightmare · 05/05/2022 20:24
It was maudlin and tedious. And fgs, Kathy is going on an extended holiday- not emigrating.
And on the continuing subject of weird absences from current events- why has Lynda been silent? She was almost killed in GG.
BlueBlueCowWondering · 05/05/2022 19:57
I suspect Thursday's episode was supposedly to be end-of-an-era moving but I just found it dull
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
KimikosNightmare · 05/05/2022 20:22
It would only be discriminatory if there was discrimination. If Ian gets a discretionary bonus and Kathy didn't, that would be, but not giving Tracey one isn't.
Luculentus · 05/05/2022 18:17
Isn't it dodgy employment practice to decide to give bonuses to a favoured few redundant employees? Surely it's a hostage to fortune unless you can show a completely open, clear selection process so that there is no possible hint of any type of discrimination.
BlueBlueCowWondering · 05/05/2022 19:57
I suspect Thursday's episode was supposedly to be end-of-an-era moving but I just found it dull
Luculentus · 05/05/2022 18:17
Isn't it dodgy employment practice to decide to give bonuses to a favoured few redundant employees? Surely it's a hostage to fortune unless you can show a completely open, clear selection process so that there is no possible hint of any type of discrimination.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.