We're looking to move and the only house we've seen so far that ticked all our boxes in our search area was a newish build (8 yrs old). The estate agent's details briefly mentioned a charge of £20 per month for "grass cutting". The estate looked neat and tidy and well managed, so £20 a month seemed reasonable, albeit annoying on top of the Band E council tax.
However when we made further enquiries it turned out the charge was in fact more like £35 a month, having gone up considerably since the property was built. A copy of the management company accounts showed that of the total bill split between all the houses on the estate, half of it was "management fees". Thousands of pounds just going to this company to do very little (the roads have been adopted, the management company is responsible for only some communal grassed areas).
I then did more research and found that there is no cap on how much these charges can be increased by each year and no recourse for residents to challenge it. We decided we weren't prepared to take this on so walked away.
I'm glad we did as there now appears to be more and more publicity around these "fleecehold" schemes - articles in the press, and government consultations on reducing the prevalence of these arrangements and on increasing the rights of homeowners already subject to them. This will hopefully yield positive benefits eventually, but my concern is that anyone owning one of these homes (and I know there are a lot, as it's virtually all new build estates now), may find it affects saleability and or value. If measures are put in place to stop this practice, why would anyone want to take on a property which is already tied in to such additional fees on top of council tax?
It is very limiting though, as it rules out a lot of properties, as the area we are looking has a lot of new estates.
I just wonder if we are being unusually cautious, or whether others are also now wary of these schemes?