Just popping back as someone commented on new builds losing value initially and they're right.
However, most of those flats I mentioned to you are 20-25 years old, so they've had more than enough time to recover.
None of the houses on one smart, very well located estate in question has lost nearly as much money as the flats.
I think the issue in my area is over-building. There are houses and flats going up in every direction around the town and when there's over-supply, the only way is down.
Secondly, I think there are maybe one or two companies who control most of the leaseholds who have just put them up massively - I even saw one S.C. of 1900 on one of those flats - I couldn't find it when I tried to look for it for you - but I recall it was on for 80 or 90k when it had sold over 15 years ago for something eye popping like 220k or 250k.
Nobody wants to pay 1900 a year SC on a 700 sq ft flat in the NE.
Sure, places like Harrogate and York maybe. But, not here. The town hasn't got enough going for it.
If I was risking my future on a 5 year purchase, I wouldn't take a punt on a leasehold flat. I'd rather move to a completely different area to buy a share of freehold flat - converted Victorian mansions, etc.
When (and if) the goverment come to deal with Leasehold Reform, it's going to be difficult and messy too.
They go and put all these laws in place to protect the working massif but their regulators are about as effective as chocolate teapots, so they'll only protect the most obstinate of people who are prepared to turn their lives upside down to fight for their legal rights.
What about renting a nice house, you handpick the flatmate as a lodger, split the cost, get a better kitchen and standard of living through that instead, maybe?