Hi! I am new here so please excuse the lack of abbreviations and such :)
My partner and I found our perfect house - an Edwardian semi-detached property with loads of potential in West London. We were sure this is the right house even after speaking to the surveyor (level 3) who highlighted a few issues but he did not make them out to be serious enough for us to pull out from the purchase. However, now that we have done our own research we are getting seriously anxious.
The surveyor highlighted that there are cracks around the bay window which is most likely caused by subsidence. There is a large tree on the public footpath just outside the house, that combined with the clay soil the house is built on leads to subsidence. One of the structural engineers we have spoken to suggested that remedial works can only be determined after monitoring the movement for at least 10-12 months. So whether underpinning is needed is not clear yet. Of course waiting 12 months before exchange is not feasible for us (and the vendors as well). Meanwhile, we have instructed our solicitor to ask for the current home insurance, whether it covers subsidence, if it can be trasnferred to us and if any subsidence claims were made in the past
Sorry for the length intro, what we really need advice on:
- Should we disclose the survey findings to the insurer ? Or just pay for the fixes ourselves (even if it requires underpinning) just to keep the insurance premium low and have the subsidence cover. If we disclose the findings, does it mean that no insurer will be provide subsidence cover ?
- Assuming worst case scenario that we buy the house and have to do the underpinning, would that mean we will struggle to sell the house in the future. We plan to stay there for at least 10-15 years, but I am also aware that there is a stigma around properties which needed underpinning, even if it is for something as common as bay structure movement
Thank you!