Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Property/DIY

Join our Property forum for renovation, DIY, and house selling advice.

Can't believe no friends will act as guarantors - why do they think they have to pay?

589 replies

IWillAlwaysBeinaClubWithYouin1973 · 14/05/2025 23:20

I mean do they literally think I am going to refuse to pay my rent?

Split from H last year, my home of over 30 was sold I have the equity in the bank still because I've just pulled out of a house purchase and decided to continue renting. Found a new flat within days now I am actually scared I'm not going to get it, nor anything else to rent, unless I have a guarantor. New letting agents/landlord not accepting equity, they want a guarantor as well as 6 months in advance.

I've just stood guarantor for my youngest DD and her uni flatmate, didn't think twice. I know what's involved, I would have thought it's obvious you assume the person will pay their rent - surely you just use your judgement? But had some awkward conversations with friends - we're all professional people, but they actually they think its going to affect their credit rating, ability to get a mortgage and that it will "stretch them financially"? I work, have the equity from the house in the bank, I'm 60 bloody 2! How much of a flight risk do I appear to these friends?! So far 2 said no, 2 ghosting me, I need to provide info to the agent first thing in the morning. Going to move on further down my list but it's getting more and more tenuous. I feel a bit sick to be honest.

Do you know what a guarantor is/does or would you too think you stood a reasonable chance of losing £000s, or even that I was actually asking for money in some way? Is it something that people just don't feel comfortable to do?

OP posts:
Clafoutie · 15/05/2025 13:32

KievLoverTwo · 15/05/2025 12:41

@IWillAlwaysBeinaClubWithYouin1973 thanks for the update. So, since I last moved six months ago, the rental market has turned into an absolute shitshow, yet again. Lovely.

Anyway, re: renters rights/renters reform bill:

  • It's currently going through the house of Lords at pace and is expected to become law around October; the last day of the House of Lords debating it is today.
  • It will effectively DISSOLVE ALL TENANCIES; that's right, it doesn't matter if they force you to sign a 12 month agreement, the minute it becomes law, that term no longer exists. You can give two months notice at any point.
  • To further illustrate: you can tell an agency you're looking for a 5 year rental, move in, give your notice on day 1 and leave 2 months later. Fixed term tenancies will cease to exist.
  • Upfront payments of rent of more than 5 weeks will be banned. They are not currently. I suspect this is why you're experiencing this now: they know they can get away with taking 6-12 months upfront rent now, but come October, they won't be able to do that.
  • Bidding wars for rentals will be banned. I've been asked 'what's the most you'd be prepared to pay for this rental?' (in 20/21) and that will become illegal. It's predicted that what will happen instead is LL's will massively overprice their rentals and future tenants will bid them down, the LL can then take the highest bidder under the over-inflated rental value. Haven't seen anything to stop this from happening yet.

They may even be forced to give back big advance rent payments - I don't know, I haven't read anyone who's covered off that particular point.

So, in your particular circumstances, give them 6 months if they want it - but, for the love of god, look up the estate agent's books on Companies House and make sure they're fully solvent and have been for many, many years, that your (normal portion) of the deposit is in a Deposit Protection Scheme, and that you get a receipt for the advance rent you pay.

The Independent Landlord is my go-to source on all things renters reform. She did an update just today.

Edited

This is all very interesting and helpful, thank you. This is where MN can be useful!

MyPantsAreMissing · 15/05/2025 13:32

I have watched too much Judge Judy to ever co sign for anything!!

thecatneuterer · 15/05/2025 13:33

Rosscameasdoody · 15/05/2025 12:08

Normally when the initial fixed term tenancy agreement ends, the guarantor can end the agreement at that point. They can also end it if there is a change of circumstance during the course of the tenancy agreement, such as an increase in the rent. Any guarantor should make sure of the specifics of the tenancy period before they sign.

I wouldn't say that's normal. The NRLA deed of guarantee would only cease to apply if an entirely new contract were issued. The agreement can become periodic and the rent can be increased by using form something or other (forgotten the name of it) while keeping the guarantor on the hook.

KievLoverTwo · 15/05/2025 13:35

Clafoutie · 15/05/2025 13:32

This is all very interesting and helpful, thank you. This is where MN can be useful!

Yay! :)

The Independent Landlord is a former lawyer called Suzanne (I think) who is a really reasonable, fair person, and she is worth following, both for LLs and tenants alike.

thecatneuterer · 15/05/2025 13:38

KievLoverTwo · 15/05/2025 12:55

I think the problem is that demand is outstripping supply and landlords feel entitled to ask for these things just because they can.

I don't think that's the case. I've seen reasonably priced rentals sit on the market and get reduced by 20% over three months in my area this year. Not just one or two - dozens.

I think the problem is - as bloody always - insurance companies.

Landlord insurance can cover void periods of 6-12 months, which is a hecking lot of money, but in return, they can stipulate whatever they want.

I'd never seen anything like it until Covid, and I've rented for decades. All of a sudden, I'm being sent draft tenancy agreements with QUARTERLY inspections listed on the T&Cs (which I refused to sign, I went elsewhere).

One agent wanted to inspect after six weeks, then every three months. I did a bit of digging at the time and it all led back to insurance companies. They got burned a lot during Covid and now they're setting insane restrictions.

Landlords who don't have shit insurance policies or who are so wealthy that they don't need them won't need to force tenants to put up with these measures.

Quarterly inspections are a mandatory requirement of many property licensing which many Councils have introduced. I'm a landlord in Newham. My licence requires me to do quarterly inspections on all my properties and to send the reports to the Council.

CocoPlum · 15/05/2025 13:39

Absolutely not.

I know someone who had no plans to not pay rent, was furloughed in covid and then nearly died of a health issue so couldn't work any other job during lockdown.

Two completely unpredictable things. You never know what life might throw your way, leaving you suddenly unable to work and your mates responsible for your rent.

And of course you'd do it for your child! That's not at all comparable.

KievLoverTwo · 15/05/2025 13:50

thecatneuterer · 15/05/2025 13:38

Quarterly inspections are a mandatory requirement of many property licensing which many Councils have introduced. I'm a landlord in Newham. My licence requires me to do quarterly inspections on all my properties and to send the reports to the Council.

Fair enough. But this was a private rent. And I've never come across it before, nor in my three tenancies since. Hence, I think that particular one was insurance-led.

FictionalCharacter · 15/05/2025 13:50

IWillAlwaysBeinaClubWithYouin1973 · 14/05/2025 23:31

I'm sort of glad I asked because now I can see I was unrealistic. I've got one family member I can ask in the morning and then after that its Ex-h or nothing.

Just for people saying offer a year in advance, it's a 6 month rental and I've already agreed to 6 months upfront.

What does he need a guarantor for then? He’s getting the entire term’s rent upfront. He can’t fail to get the money. Seems to me he’s just being bloodyminded.

I think you’ve had some harsh replies. I wouldn’t be offended if a friend asked me, even if the answer was no.
This thread has been an eye opener. How exactly is a 62 year old meant to find a guarantor? If I were in your position I’d be stuffed. I’m older than you, parents dead, few living relatives, no friends. If I had to leave DH and find a rental I don’t see how I’d do it.

ThrowAwayHooray · 15/05/2025 13:51

Thegodfatherreturns · 15/05/2025 13:24

But the landlord could just sue OP for the money. She has income from her pension so why rely on suing a guarantor rather than OP?

Because guarantors have to be homeowners (as well as having a decent income) so if they go after them, the debt can be secured against their house.

Unsecured debt is always riskier as the person could die tomorrow thus no more income and if there’s no estate (or not enough to go around depending on other debt) then that’s it, they’ve lost the money.

Silvertulips · 15/05/2025 14:01

I was going to say, sign up for a Uni coarse, take the Uni flat and get a guarantor! They are about £300 for the year for students!

Im sorry you are having a hard time, rentals are an all time low -

Could you stay with a friend instead? That way they can make a bit of extra cash and it gives you breathing space. I would let a friend stay, not sure as guarantor.

thecatneuterer · 15/05/2025 14:02

KievLoverTwo · 15/05/2025 13:50

Fair enough. But this was a private rent. And I've never come across it before, nor in my three tenancies since. Hence, I think that particular one was insurance-led.

I'm talking about private rent. Property licensing is for private landlords and it's spreading quickly round the country. I think all of London is now covered by it. It contains many regulations with quarterly inspections being one.

ThrowAwayHooray · 15/05/2025 14:06

FictionalCharacter · 15/05/2025 13:50

What does he need a guarantor for then? He’s getting the entire term’s rent upfront. He can’t fail to get the money. Seems to me he’s just being bloodyminded.

I think you’ve had some harsh replies. I wouldn’t be offended if a friend asked me, even if the answer was no.
This thread has been an eye opener. How exactly is a 62 year old meant to find a guarantor? If I were in your position I’d be stuffed. I’m older than you, parents dead, few living relatives, no friends. If I had to leave DH and find a rental I don’t see how I’d do it.

Because there’s no guarantee OP will leave at the end of the term, is there? What happens if after the 6 months OP decides she’s not leaving nor is she paying anymore rent?

It can take over a year to evict someone so by having a guarantor, the landlord is ensuring someone is on the hook for rent past the initial 6 months if needs be.

KievLoverTwo · 15/05/2025 14:06

thecatneuterer · 15/05/2025 14:02

I'm talking about private rent. Property licensing is for private landlords and it's spreading quickly round the country. I think all of London is now covered by it. It contains many regulations with quarterly inspections being one.

"and it's spreading quickly round the country."

Good to know, thanks.

CandidHedgehog · 15/05/2025 14:06

FictionalCharacter · 15/05/2025 13:50

What does he need a guarantor for then? He’s getting the entire term’s rent upfront. He can’t fail to get the money. Seems to me he’s just being bloodyminded.

I think you’ve had some harsh replies. I wouldn’t be offended if a friend asked me, even if the answer was no.
This thread has been an eye opener. How exactly is a 62 year old meant to find a guarantor? If I were in your position I’d be stuffed. I’m older than you, parents dead, few living relatives, no friends. If I had to leave DH and find a rental I don’t see how I’d do it.

If eviction becomes necessary, the guarantor is needed to cover the time between the end of the fixed term (when the pre-paid rent runs out) and when the landlord manages to get the eviction through the courts. This is generally an additional 12 months or so from start to finish (assuming the landlord starts the eviction process as soon as the first rent payment is missed).

He is also covered for the cost of the eviction and any damage caused.

That’s a lot of money he could fail to get if something goes wrong.

Thegodfatherreturns · 15/05/2025 14:18

ThrowAwayHooray · 15/05/2025 14:06

Because there’s no guarantee OP will leave at the end of the term, is there? What happens if after the 6 months OP decides she’s not leaving nor is she paying anymore rent?

It can take over a year to evict someone so by having a guarantor, the landlord is ensuring someone is on the hook for rent past the initial 6 months if needs be.

OP is on the hook though. She has a pension so the landlord will be able to sue her.

Thegodfatherreturns · 15/05/2025 14:22

ThrowAwayHooray · 15/05/2025 13:51

Because guarantors have to be homeowners (as well as having a decent income) so if they go after them, the debt can be secured against their house.

Unsecured debt is always riskier as the person could die tomorrow thus no more income and if there’s no estate (or not enough to go around depending on other debt) then that’s it, they’ve lost the money.

Edited

When I have signed as a guarantor fir DC they haven't required proof I was a home owner and even if you are there might not be any equity on the property. I don't think the debt can be secured against the house unless the court orders it to be anyway. I have only been asked for proof of income.

AnonymousBleep · 15/05/2025 14:24

I've been asked to do it previously and I said very sorry but no too. The thing is, I don't really know anyone's financial situation, and as a single parent on a very average income, I just can't take the risk of being responsible for someone else's rent. Why would I? I wouldn't even do it for a close friend or family member tbh.

It's a shit situation to be in though OP and I do empathise.

ThrowAwayHooray · 15/05/2025 14:28

Thegodfatherreturns · 15/05/2025 14:18

OP is on the hook though. She has a pension so the landlord will be able to sue her.

Edited

See my other response to you which explains it more.

Thegodfatherreturns · 15/05/2025 14:31

ThrowAwayHooray · 15/05/2025 14:28

See my other response to you which explains it more.

I have responded to that.

ThrowAwayHooray · 15/05/2025 14:41

Thegodfatherreturns · 15/05/2025 14:22

When I have signed as a guarantor fir DC they haven't required proof I was a home owner and even if you are there might not be any equity on the property. I don't think the debt can be secured against the house unless the court orders it to be anyway. I have only been asked for proof of income.

  1. They don’t require you to prove you’re a homeowner, you usually agree to appropriate checks and they then look you up on the land registry based on your address

  2. Yes there may be no equity in the property but it’s still safer than unsecured debt, it’s about minimising risk rather than having a 100% guarantee

  3. Yes debt can only be secured against a house with a court order, the person I was replying to was specifically talking about suing in court for the debt hence my response

SpinandSing · 15/05/2025 14:42

Becoming a guarantor could affect your credit rating in that they will run a credit check on you. It should be a soft search but may still show up to lenders if you're applying for a new credit card/loan. It's a temporary thing rather than permanent.

ThrowAwayHooray · 15/05/2025 14:43

Thegodfatherreturns · 15/05/2025 14:31

I have responded to that.

Sorry didn’t realise you were the same poster! 😂

butterdish93 · 15/05/2025 14:44

I’m quite a kind person and there’s lots I would do for friends but I would not guarantee for anyone but my kids or elderly parents one day because that is my duty. I would not take that risk when I have the responsibility to provide for my family and I couldn’t possibly do that if your rent fell to me for whatever reason.
its not your friends fault, don’t be annoyed with them. It’s the housing systems fault.

Veganpug · 15/05/2025 14:54

IWillAlwaysBeinaClubWithYouin1973 · 15/05/2025 12:19

Yes, and I am already drawing a private pension, so two sources of income. I think some people have been really keen to insist I must have a bad credit record, I've never had any issues at all. I think the issue is, I have been offered a flat that I like and need, everything is great about it, but the landlord wants an additional layer of safeguarding and if I am not prepared to offer it, he has no obligation to agree to rent to me.

So there are two strands here aren't there, the issue of my being stupid in the first place which is clear, and all I can do is my best to put that right. I'm lucky no one was upset or put out. Now we are moving into the land of rental problems in general, and I think I said upthread I'd already asked MNHQ to consider a renters' topic so I will be following up on that with them.

Gosh it sounds really hard to rent op
I thought the powers that be were making things better for tennants , allowing pets and things
Perhaps not tho
Is it supply and demand causing this ,so so many people needing to rent landlords can ask for ridiculous terms

BeesTrees · 15/05/2025 15:00

IWillAlwaysBeinaClubWithYouin1973 · 15/05/2025 12:13

@Clafoutie of course I see your point and thanks for understanding.

Just popped on again as someone reminded me - if you want to use your equity it has to have been in an instant access bank account for 6 months, dependent on the referencing company the lettings agents uses. They are all different, there's no blanket rules. There's a lovely agent near here that uses Goodlord, they accept equity in your bank account for only 30 days - if only they had a property to rent to me.

Also I've had 2 quotes for the guarantee companies. One was £177 a month on top of your rent, and the other was £1,500 for 6 months.

I've also checked with my mortgage broker and he said its not possible for your simply "being" a guarantor to affect your credit rating or the amount you can borrow (although Google says differently so not sure if the jury is still out on that one).

I’m glad you got your situation sorted.

I wanted to sell and rent with equity and I didn’t know this was rule! So it’s a good thing I saw this thread and didn’t plow on with the idea. Is that a rule only when you are paying 6 months to a year upfront? Or is it even applied to the deposit and first months rent?