The OP is talking about how female teachers engage with boys.
My step-son's primary class was very unusual in that out of 24 pupils, 22 of them were boys!!! It was obviously a good year for boys.
Over the years, the class was described as 'savage', 'bestial', 'impossible to teach' and unruly.
Those boys were none of those things. They were being taught by girly women, and not women with grit. A woman with grit, a female teacher with grit, is a marvellous thing. Boys are interested in different things than girls. A female teacher needs to understand that.
But most don't. And I would have preferred my step-son's class to have been taught by men, or women who largely think like men.
My sister-in-law is a deputy head mistress, and whilst she's extremely effective most of the time, when she's due on her period, she's noticably different. She shouts, she cries, and she's utterly irrational.
And this is a girl at the top of her game.
So, to my detractors, I don't really give a fiddler's fark. I'm a woman myself. I know what our strengths and weaknesses are. But at primary level, I would prefer a man to teach my son.
Or, if not a man, than a woman like myself. Not a girly wimpo.