Noddyholder - here's a thing - would you feel more like voting if there was a party more adequately representing your views? And what are those views?
At the moment we have three big parties, and they have converged towards a centre ground. Ish. And they are quite limited in what they actually present to the electorate in their manifestoes because A LOT of power is held by so-called swing-voters. It's crazy, but that's the situation our electoral system appears to have evolved.
A lot of smaller parties, and more marginal issues (including the one dear to my heart, environmental issues - which should be sooo important, but because electoral death beckons for the party endorsing them, becomes marginalised and watered down at parliamentary level,) never get a look in under this system.
The more marginal positions thus become very unprofessional, have little money, and are barely represented at an organisational, let alone parliamentary level.
Well, there is (an outside) chance that with PR, that might change.
So ... if there is something you would wish to be represented, here is your chance to vote, if not for that actual position, then for the (outside) chance that the set-up might be changed so that, eventually, that position you would like to vote for might be realised.
It's only an outside chance. But it's closer than it's been for a long, long time. And I could be wrong. But it's an idea.
Though I do think not voting has its place.