Elaine, your logic and conmclusions read like something out of a hysterical student tract circa 1969.
'In respect of the other point, it's the 'if they're bad schools' that's the rub. If parents dislike a school because of its intake, and they set up another, then the other school suffers as a direct result of that. Especially if, as in Bristol, they buy land in one postcode because it's cheaper, but don't let any of the children within that postcode in, because they're only interested in providing for their own children and the children of their friends'
So you think that those who remove their children form execrable state schools are to blame if those schools get even worse without their influnce?
Eh? So they are to be held morally responsible? Next, ou'll be coming out with the appalling Fiona Millar's assertion that 'If free schools are good then everyone will want to go to them.'
Have you any idea how bonkers you sound?
I'd also be very interested in your proof that those setting up free schools are only interested in their own kids and those of their mates. And no. Radio 4 won't do.
Smallwhitecat speaks with absolute accuracy. Everythnig she says is true. She does in fact underply quite how terrifyingly dire it all is. It's even worse. and I know that both as a professional in this field and as someone whose child would, were I not the person I am, be at the mercy of a dismal mishmash of undertrained, power mad bullies, intoxicated by the lethal mix of sheer unaccountability and power tripping that is rife in SEN/LEA provision.
Never forget, those involved in education, particulalry SEN, have a vested power in ensuring nothing works to well. If (God forbid) children actually progress and need less support, what happen to all their cosy little jobs.
You have no idea of the fight and difficulties that people who set up Free Schhols and schools like Jigsaw have, against a malicious machine of people peddling the tripe that you have gobbles up for breakfast (teaching unions being some of the worse offenders).