Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Should there be a referendum on the future of the monarchy when the queen dies?

67 replies

dingdong89 · 29/04/2011 17:06

When the queen eventually passes away, should the British electorate be given the opportunity to express whether or not they would like the monarchy to continue?

Personally, I think it would be very sensible to hold such a referendum when the time comes.

When the queen ceases to be head of state after so many decades, it will lead to a significant collective psychological adjustment in the nation - because for most of us, she is the only head of state we've ever known. Thus, I believe that when we reach that crossroads, it would be appropriate to officially assess how the nation actually feels about the monarchy.

OP posts:
claig · 30/04/2011 23:47

I mean Gordon Brown

claig · 30/04/2011 23:51

'Ok then newwave - how would you organise things then?'

jackstarb, please don't encourage her. We already have quite enough socialist ranting and raving and foaming at the mouth on Mumsnet. A little more sanity, sobriety and sense of the Conservative variety should instead be encouraged.

newwave · 30/04/2011 23:54

How would I organise things, very simple.

Become a republic where anyone can stand for election and the one with the most votes becomes President.

After an agreed period we can either re-elect him or throw him out and elect someone else.

One good thing, the President cannot hand the job to his eldest Son unless of course he stands for the job and we elect him.

Second thing we wont have to pay for his/her relations from the public purse.

newwave · 30/04/2011 23:55

sense of the Conservative variety.

Now that is an oxymoron unlike you who is just a moron

jackstarb · 01/05/2011 00:06

Newwave - thanks.

That sounds like the US model of government. What would you do about political dynasties (Clintons, Kennedys)? Who is that ok by you?

jackstarb · 01/05/2011 00:09

And of course the Bush dynasty? You are happy to let power pass along the generations as long as we vote them in.

jackstarb · 01/05/2011 00:27

Claig - I can get my head around a right wing, meritocratic republic. It makes sense and fits well with the 'free market' economic model. The talent rises to the top and runs the country.

I can't quite see how a 'left wing' republic works.

claig · 01/05/2011 00:30

Think of North Korea

claig · 01/05/2011 00:32

The talentless rise to the top. It's topsy turvy. The scientific term they use is progressive.

claig · 01/05/2011 00:37

It usually ends in tears. At the end they ususllay leave a note, saying "sorry, there's no money left"

MaryMotherOfCheeses · 01/05/2011 00:38

Ok, I 'm confused.

What's the difference between a President and a Prime Minister?

Why do we need a President AND a Prime Minister if we don't ahve a Monarchy? US seems to cope with just one of them...

madhattershouse · 01/05/2011 00:41

Perhaps a referendum as to whether the crown passes directly to William...

claig · 01/05/2011 00:45

Good point MaryMotherOfCheeses. The US only has one.

madhattershouse, are you posting from Newwave's house? I too would run off dodging.

claig · 01/05/2011 00:56

Good night all. Have to rise early to continue with the right royal knees up to celebrate the wedding.

MaryMotherOfCheeses · 01/05/2011 01:00

Not a point, just a question.

claig · 01/05/2011 01:00

Also have to queue up early for the Sunday Mail Wedding Special before it sells out.

aliceliddell · 01/05/2011 16:51

Problem with that M on S Wedding supplement is that it's on glossy paper, so not very absorbent. Not as good as Andrex, anyway.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page