look its like this - the idea is that charities will compete for contracts for certain services - they will be competing with multiple private companies, councils and perhaps, other charities.
this means that charities will have to be highly organised and in a position to take on these contracted services
i'm thinking certain serices such as providing services for the elderly could only be championed by a charity already with the substructure in place - such as AGE UK the same can be repeated with other services such as mental health etc.
we are certainl not imo, talking about a group of grannies with fuck all else to do, setting up a book collection scheme to keep a library running.
imo - and from the imformation i have gleened, it will have to be much much more business orientated.
the major charities could be in a position to compete for these contracts, but this could be at the expense of smaller charities
and my cynical brain tells me that this means that lots of smaller charities will get pushed out, they will find it harder to get money and grants and the HR processes for a strictly large business run charity will mean that they will employ highly skilled highly paid people from the private sector - as perhaps they should to be able to compete.
there is this mistaken thinking 0 i think - that there will be lots of little small community projects that will get lots of funding, and it simply will not be so.
anyone who works in this secto absolutley knows that unless there is a mandate for say - unemployed people - or people in reciept of certain benefits to 'volunteer' or don't get their benefits - that there just arent the volunteers out there to do this work.