Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

For sale: Our lovely forests

57 replies

grannieonabike · 31/10/2010 14:01

Can anyone explain this? I think I heard on the radio that the Forestry Commission is going to sell off the Forest of Dean.

(Also heard that the people of Dover are going to buy the Port, but that was better than Calais buying it!?)Confused

OP posts:
tunny · 02/02/2011 17:34

Have a look here for latest information on the proposed sell off of the public woods and forests. Click on the 'latest news' heading on the right of the page. It covers many topics discussed recently.
saveourforests.co.uk/

Also look at these two for more information.
saveourwoods.co.uk/

saveenglandsforests.org/whats-the-score-2

www.fctu.org.uk/SaveOurForests/index.asp

The forests and woodlands are important places for the family and it would be a great shame if they were sold off and access restricted and the environment damaged.

complimentary · 02/02/2011 17:48

Does anyone know how the debate on the above went in the Commons today?

Chil1234 · 03/02/2011 06:57

Labour suddenly went all middle-class and tried to whip up a fight. DC appeared to say that there may be concessions. It was pointed out that Labour sold off several forests without a murmur and with no protection preconditions either (interesting). I still think this is being radically overblown.

complimentary · 03/02/2011 10:13

Chil1234. It's a pity we did not know that the Labour Party had sold off forests as well! In fact why was this not covered in the media, as well as this present proposed sell off?

Perhaps they will have a u-turn? Hope so.

Chil1234 · 03/02/2011 17:00

Funnily enough I've just been reading a leaflet all about the 'National Forest Project'. It's a quango sponsored by DEFRA and it's corporate statement is "working partnerships with landowners, businesses, public, private and voluntary organisations and local communities to fulfil the shared vision for the Forest". Sponsors include Lex Autolease, Alliance and Leicester, Jaguar, Severn Trent Water, Rolls Royce... it's a long list. Now that's not owned by the Forestry Commission and seems to be working rather well, good public access, commitments to sustainability etc.

'Sold off' is a very emotive term and I think it's being mischievously misused at the moment for political purposes

Isthreetoomany · 10/02/2011 16:51

Bump

Petition is at www.38degrees.org.uk/page/s/save-our-forests

Also the DEFRA map that classifies the forests is bizarre. The forest of bere near me is classified as 'small commercial' meaning it is one of the ones they are talking about selling/leasing first - yet it is certainly not a dark coniferous forest where no one goes. It has 2 great play areas, 3 car parks, toilets, picnic sites and BBQs!!

Singinginmychains · 10/02/2011 21:42

Took my son + 9 friends to a paintball party in Scotland at the weekend.

The woman who runs the centre told me that when they started up they were only allowed one small unobtrusive hut. A couple of years later three more buildings had sprung up. Now they have got permission to build a castle and a Vietcong(?) type area in order to upgrade their facilities. In the middle of a small forest.

It suddenly dawned on me that the selling-off of the forests has been going on for years (it takes me a while to catch on). And it's happening because people like me take their kids paintballing.

I try to make myself feel better about it by classing paintballing along with sports like skiing or golf that also colonise huge areas of our beautiful landscape, and I do sincerely like to see people out in the countryside doing active things rather than sitting in front of their computers or Wiiing in the front room.

But - by building that Paintball Centre, and the large campsite nearby, and the GoKarting place down the road and the Sphere (?) thing that's just starting up, they are wrecking our wildernesses. If the forests really were wild, people could still run round excitedly firing paint at each other, and it would be much scarier and a fraction of the price. The whole thing cost me over £300 (mainly because of all the added extras that you don't realise you are going to have to pay for when you get there, in order to join in).

So who benefits? My son and his friends did this time. But their children and grandchildren won't be so lucky. I can't see that the locals get much out of it. The odd B&B, maybe, but that surely doesn't compensate them for the increased traffic on the roads and the loss of their lovely forest. The real winners are, and always will be, the huge nationwide company that runs these places.

Feel very Sad about it, and won't go again

New posts on this thread. Refresh page