Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Philosophy/religion

Join our Philosophy forum to discuss religion and spirituality.

Should Catholics receive communion in an Anglican church?

66 replies

Golda · 10/10/2009 20:19

I am going to a baptism tomorrow in a CofE church. Are Catholics supposed to receive in other churches?

OP posts:
ZZZenAgain · 10/10/2009 21:35

Methodists eh? So that's where all the wine is.

ZZZenAgain · 10/10/2009 21:38

actually even without swine flu, I have to admit the idea of passing round a chalice, glass or whatever, strikes me as unhygienic. I like those little individual glasses...

wicked · 10/10/2009 21:52

Swine flu restrictions were cancelled about 3 weeks ago.

cat64 · 10/10/2009 21:55

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

cat64 · 10/10/2009 21:56

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

SardineQueen · 10/10/2009 22:00

Yes that's the same with us wicked - cat you'll have to keep an eye on the wine woman

MaryBS · 11/10/2009 08:35

Wow this thread got busy!

Swine flu restrictions still in place in our C of E church...

cat64 · 11/10/2009 11:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Tortington · 11/10/2009 11:40

the difference lies in men, money, state and power in a historical sense.

so WWJD? i think jesus would say the RCC is tapped

i wouldn't have an issue with it

Golda · 11/10/2009 17:37

I'm back!

It was all a bit strange. It was similar to our service but less of it and no communion at all. It wasn't just the baptism though, it was the regular service. It was called morning worship.

OP posts:
wicked · 11/10/2009 20:33

Golda,

At my Anglican church we have communion once a month (we call it Holy Communion). Other times we have Family Worship or All-Age Worship.

We don't tend to have Baptisms during the Communion service as it would end up making the service really long.

cat64 · 11/10/2009 21:25

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

wicked · 11/10/2009 21:29

We have four services every Sunday, and there will be HC at one of them. I don't know anyone that rotates arounds the services just to go to (or avoid) HC.

I have been to a few baptisms in the RCC and found it weird that they were special services in the afternoon. That totally goes against the Anglican grain, where you are welcoming the baby/child/adult into the church family.

I have also been to RCC baptisms during a regular mass and they are as joyous as Anglican ones.

MrsMerryHenry · 11/10/2009 21:42

This sort of 'issue' is exactly why so many people get so pissed off with the church. A few weeks ago I heard a C of E representative (someone from Rowan Williams' office, I believe) talking about the Back To Church campaign which they'd launched. The idea behind it was that people who don't go to church do so because they don't think church is for them. And that people who do go to church don't invite their non-believing friends because they don't want to overstep the mark.

I think this man was deluded. The reason why most people don't go to church, IMO and IME, is because all too often church is a load of crap. Far too many churches waste time, energy and money arguing over pointless minutiae like this, and completely ignore the fullness of what God has commanded us: to love him with all our hearts, minds and souls, and to love every single other human being as much as we love ourselves. If we really, truly made those two commands the be all and end all of our lives, would we have time for arsing around over who is entitled to take communion and where, and is there an ordained minister around because if not it's virtually illegal, etc, etc.? Really? Jesus did not come up with this bullshit - we humans added it to our faith and it offers absolutely nothing of benefit to any living soul.

I write this as a lifelong and dedicated Christian who has just started going to church after several years' absence.

Just take the communion if you want to - let the matter be between God and you, and leave all the unnecessary nonsense to people who have nothing better to occupy them.

wicked · 11/10/2009 21:48

I agree with you, mmh.

In the Church of England, the only thing that needs an ordained priest is the consecration of the communion elements, which is uttering a handful of words. Everything else can be done by a lay person. A lot of people will say that the riest needs to do the absolution and final blessing, but all you do is change 'you' to 'us' and you are legal, ha!

And you can always have an Agape meal (share bread and wine together, as friends) if there is no priest available.

We break every rule in the book, apart from the consecration one, in our church. Then we don't need to have communion in every service.

It was very funny the first time the bishop came to visit and our clergy were wearing lounge suits. Mercy! But we still contribute more to parish share than anyone else in the diocese so he let us get away with it.

catinthehat2 · 12/10/2009 16:01

Another subscriber to the lightning bolt theory I see. Good, good.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page