Have you broken it down and applied it to my reasoning.
Your reasoning is, "it makes sense to me". There's really not that much to decompose.
As I said before I don't come on here to demonstrate. I can't show you but you can demonstrate it to yourself.
Can you please explain the methodology I would use to demonstrate it to myself so that I can try it?
What does that mean though. You realise you're just saying words? We're on a forum. What else can I use.
OK, I'm sure you know what I meant, but I appreciate that my question was a little ambiguous. Your statement has absolutely no substance, it's a meaningless phrase. You seem to be completely incapable of explaining what you mean when you use arbitrary sentences which have probably been drilled into you from an early age by religious teaching and which you've been indoctrinated to just accept as having intrinsic meaning. But they don't.
You'll only be satisfied with a mainstream scientific explanation.
I'll be satisfied if you can explain how you would go about demonstrating that we have come back to this life multiple times. Not even asking you to actually demonstate it, just the method you would use to do so.
But as you've brought up science. The scientific method is the only reliable way that we have of getting towards the truth of things. Faith, as an example, is not a reliable method. Therefore, as someone who wants to believe as many true things and as few false things as possible, yes, scientific experiments, I believe, are the best way to do this.