Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Philosophy/religion

Join our Philosophy forum to discuss religion and spirituality.

Religion is the root of all evil?

51 replies

Tinker · 08/01/2006 11:09

Who is going to be watching dishy Dawkins tomorrow?

OP posts:
Tinker · 13/01/2006 11:51

He condemns the concept of religion as loony - no problem with that. He's got another letter in today's Indie.

OP posts:
Rhubarb · 13/01/2006 11:52

Oh, ok then. But why pick on particular religions then? Why not just explore the theory behind religion and compare this with the scientific point of fun? Or is that just not good telly?

Rhubarb · 13/01/2006 11:53

Point of fun?????? I meant point of view of course!

harpsichordcarrier · 13/01/2006 11:56

yes he's pretty general Rhubarb
not particular religions
I think he finds the loons because (he would say) they speak the "truth" without fear or favour and of course becauseit makes good telly...
Tinker I know who you mean

Rhubarb · 13/01/2006 12:02

I wish he would interview ordinary Christians for a change then! Or those people who work in Brazil saving children's lives for a Christian charity, or the nuns attached to Mother Theresa's order. That would give it a fairer balance.

I guess as a Christian you just have to accept that sometimes you are fair game.

Tinker · 13/01/2006 12:09

There are more programmes to come. Am sure he will. Doesn't change the view that the concept of religion is loony.

Gotta go, baby wrapping herself in teh curtains.

OP posts:
Rhubarb · 13/01/2006 12:11

I guess he's entitled to his views!

spacedonkey · 13/01/2006 12:13

I missed this programme unfortunately. Did he talk about the biological basis of the religious impulse?

Tinker · 13/01/2006 12:14

Not yet sd (still here ), Suspect he will.

OP posts:
Rhubarb · 13/01/2006 12:17

Wish I could watch this!
Have a feeling though that he will probably come across as all smug and arrogant in dismissing half the population as no-brainers!

Tinker · 13/01/2006 12:19

Blimey, way more than half the population!

OP posts:
Blu · 13/01/2006 12:20

I was really sorry I missed this, I wanted to see it. But it got a very bad write up in the Guardian for being sloppy and partisan in an unacademic way, I think.

Spacedonkey - did you read that article in the Guardian about the biological basis of the religious impulse? I was prepared to be very interested in that, but couldn't make head nor tail of it. The comments and evidence the writer gave (was it DD?) didn't seem to lead to the conclusions he came to. I was left feeling confused and/ or thick. (may well be both, of course).

spacedonkey · 13/01/2006 12:20

John Gray's interesting on this too

spacedonkey · 13/01/2006 12:21

blu, I read an interview with dawkins in the Education section of the Guardian on tuesday - is that the one you mean?

Blu · 13/01/2006 12:39

No, I think it was last week - maybe w/e.

But i will look up the education one. thanks.

spacedonkey · 13/01/2006 12:40

I'll look up your one too!

monkeytrousers · 16/01/2006 21:02

Was great! He should have started by defining 'scientific fact' as what is more likely to be true than anything else, by evidence. People never understand the term properly and so make all kinds of category errors about it.

monkeytrousers · 16/01/2006 21:02

wot article was that Blu?

Marina · 16/01/2006 21:08

I look forward to his detailed coverage of militant secular atheists Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler, arguably two of the wickedest men of all time, and who implemented genocidal atheist totalitarianism...IMO, of course!

nooka · 16/01/2006 22:16

Ah, I was hoping that there might be a thread on this after accidentally watching this tonight. Thought it was interesting. Agree he is arrogant, and at times sloppy and partisan. But agree with most of what he said, in particular the end about only living this life and making the most of it.

nooka · 16/01/2006 22:19

I quite liked the line that religion is the only thing that can make good people do evil things (as oposed to good people doing good things, and evil people doing evil things). It wasn't his line, and I have only quoted it roughly, but interesting. I would suspect that totalitarian regimes based on dogmatic views might be quite close in a lot of ways to similar religious regimes from a sociological point of view (fundamentalist set of beliefs imposed on a population)

monkeytrousers · 16/01/2006 22:21

Why does everyone think he's arrogant? He's just very confident in what he's saying.

BadgerBadger · 17/01/2006 01:01

I don't think he's arrogant but I felt there was a glimmer of contempt or condescention, maybe borne out of frustration?

Given the 'discussion' with the "starry American Fundamentalist" of last week, I can see why. The disagreement over evolution made me PMSL; something about eyes? Or was it ears?

Only saw half the programme last week and missed this week completely, I'd like to see/read more stuff by him though. I found it a little interesting but generally predictabe.

Roobie · 17/01/2006 06:20

I just wish he'd interview some real Christian intellectuals and have a reasoned debate - but I guess they're not such an easy target and they might end up wiping the floor with him.....

monkeytrousers · 17/01/2006 08:35

Roobie, he debates with them all the time. Again it comes down to either faith or evidence.