alittlelower I haven't made any assumptions, it's a childish tactic to just throw back what I pointed out you were doing! 🙄
If you read what I wrote, using your uninterrupted education, that there should be the choice and targeted gradual return to school, so that all children aren't forced to go back, but the ones who need to for various reasons. As not every child needs to- A plan which will be safest for everyone is best, the targeted return of current Govmt plan that most teachers aren't even keen on following! To prevent crowded full schools that won't be capable of being safe social distancing in a way no other service would agree to. Shops are limiting numbers in and out, schools should too. Hospital bays have been halved for wider distancing. A&E take your temperature before letting you through the door, deciding on hot COVID side or cold side... you can't do that in a school full of pupils!
Because the measure shouldn't be how many children die (bit late then), it's also how many others get unwell including groups that were needing to keep safe. You do realise extremely vulnerable group includes lots of parents & siblings too? .That to properly shield at home with others in household with close outside contact would be psychologically damaging to those very children.
Mortality is only one measure, increased life changing ongoing health damage after COVID infection is another that no research data is available on yet- it's too new and not being measured. But I am dealing with postviral impact as well in my job. It's not being routinely measured by any statistical analysis. Most people catching it aren't even being tested, only those so ill that they're admitted to hospital, in a care homes or select limited other groups. The statistics aren't accurate, huge underestimation of R rate.
It's really not difficult to fully understand my point - you simply don't (or shouldn't try to) speak for everyone by selecting out which bit of statistics you feel will best support your overgeneralised argument. It's a pandemic. 3 months out of school is a blip, not the end of the world. Stop putting so much pressure on children!
I suggested we look at the bigger picture not extrapolate from stakeholder statistics, that demanding a full return to school, something against current advice, for every school child - because you and a minority aren't coping, isn't thought at this stage to be a healthy national policy. Those needing school, should be offered places. Btw . Childline have a duty to pass on CP or child wellbeing concerns, including those children who rang them, into vulnerable group already noted as important to be offered spaces to attend school.
Think of the children?
Yes, please do think of the children and what this petition is demanding. Far too soon. We literally have 4-5 weeks left of term.
I disagree and am by far in a majority not the minority.
All 22 of our local schools have had little take up of offered return places.