Actor/actress

[AnnabelCaramel]

Are all thespians actors these days? Is it wrong to use the word actress?

I thought lots of female actors now objected to the word actress?

If I was one I'd rather be an actress personally. Why would they object?

Actress sounds much more glamorous!

As the bishop said to the actor.

Nope, doesn't work.

It started in the Grauniad, this nonsense.

I love it when the Oscars and Baftas come out, because it forces the tight-sphinctered PC buggers to use the word "Actress"

a lot of newspapers have actor in their style book. actress is no longer used in most broadsheets, i think.

Personal choice.
Those who chose the Brechtian acting course insisted on being called 'actor'.
Those who did Farce preferred 'actress'.
And tended to have more matronly bosoms - although that may have been coincidence.

Ah, it's "Verfremdungseffekt"! Now I get it

All female actors I know are actors.

Headteachers are headteachers

I have to say I approve of the general de-sexualisation (it's a word, honest) of our language.

Should they have "Best Male Actor" and "Best Female Actor" at the Oscars then?

Again, other languages don't seem so hung up on this. French still has acteur/actrice, and German just adds -in on the end for anything female. So Tom Cruise would be "ein Schauspieler" to a German, and Glenn Close "eine Schauspielerin".

It's because the female form of words is traditionally associated with lower status. So gender neutralising a whole series of words eradicates that status divide. Now, you may think people who accept that the usage of words can have unforeseen circumstances are "tight sphinctered PC buggers" ? and actor/actress doesn't bother me much ? but you'd just be wrong and reactionary.

If I am "wrong and reactionary" then so is most of the rest of Europe.

you said it, UD!

What do they call them in the Oscars? I thought it was best male and female in a leading/supporting role?

We're not talking about European languages. We're talking about English. So which other words have been rendered out of acceptable English by "tight-sphinctered PC buggers"? I can think of nigger, coon, wog, gyppo, pikey, yid etc etc ... I'd call that a victory, not a capitulation.

i'm afraid I'm with actor. Here in Ireland, a policeman is known as a Guard and a female policeperson (!) as a Bean(pronounced ban) Garda (female Guard) You would never say a male Guard arrested so -and-s0 but people would say,it was a Bean Garda.
Annoyed the bejesus out of me.
it always seems in my tiny feminist mind that the female form of an occupation always is diminutive, I mean, aren't you glad that your child isn't taught by a teacheress, or attend church service held by a priestess !

For goodness' sake... How can you compare racial insults with feminine forms of nouns? Perspective, much?...

Is a woman who sews a seamster? Or one who flirts a tempter?

I would be an actress

actor my arse

you lot would analyse a dead fly on a windowledge

My friend used to work as a waitress. She wanted to be an actress. It wouldn't have been anywhere near as dramatic if she couldn't fling her arms around saying 'I'm an actress'.
She wasn't very good though. She is probably still a waitress. Waiter. Whichever.

UQD, words have power and meaning. I've already said why most reputable newspapers have now moved towards gender neutral terms for jobs wherever possible and practicable (clearly there are some jobs for which no gender neutral term exists). One of the reasons words evolved and were used was to assign power; feminine diminutives were used to assign power to men. Just as racial insults were used to assign power to white people. They are part of the same continuum, if at nowhere near the same place on it. This isn't "tight sphinctered PC" buggery; it's what language is all about. If you think it's petty to talk about an actor rather than an actress, how much more petty is it to sneer at a gradual (and hardly rigidly enforced) change that affects you not one jot, and which helps language evolve in a more egalitarian way?

Hmm. I get the headteacher thing. And firefighter. Because they actually are gender-neutral. But actor isn't gender neutral really, is it? It is an appropriation of the male noun for use with both sexes. So in order to be taken seriously, a woman must take the masculine form of the word?

No, because actor was a word used for anyone who acted - when there were only male actors. It wasn't a gender specific word. Actress became a gender specific word when women were allowed on stage, and so had to be given a diminutive. Actor is gender-neutral. Only social convention assigned a gender to it.

But if there were only male actors...

Anyway, social convention is what this is all about surely? You can't really say a word is gender-neutral if social convention has assigned a gender to it.