Well I (or rather a series of mumsnetters) have now spoken to the cub leader on the phone and then my ds.
I started off by saying I wanted to discuss why, when my ds when misbeving at cubs he was then often excluded from events. Having talked to other cub leaders (thanks Rainbow, Morph, Lindy, Robinw and co) I knew that this is not common practice and went against the cub ethos and I felt uneasy that he was doing this.
The leader readily agreed it was common practice and said he didn't like doing it either but had tried everything else ie sitting ds or other naughty cubs apart from the rest. He has threatened other cubs with exclusion, too, but not as much as my ds. He didn't mention that he set cubs specific tasks if they were bad.
I explained that ds was eager to go to cubs, and the leader agreed with that. He could see he enjoyed it. He said the problem was one of supervision - he had his hands full with my ds (and other boys if they played up) which meant he then couldn't do his cub leading properly. That was why he was having to think twice now about my ds attending events - he just couldn't rely on him to behave.
I then asked if it would help if I came along to meetings or events and helped out? (thanks Lindy and SueW). The answer was no, he didn't think my presence would make my son behave better long term. (I can't commit to weekly sessions on a long term basis either). Even short term, over the next few weeks got a 'no'. So I asked if my husband could help?(thanks RobinW). Again the leader said no - it's really because we are ds's parents. He said what would help him is if an older brother or cousin could sit with my ds at cubs and help him focus. Unfortunately we do not have such a person to call on.
I then asked if there was anything I could do with my ds outside cubs that would help? The cub leader already knows dh and I give my son a good talking to, or take away toys or ground him if we get a bad report from cubs. We've been doing this ever since he started Beavers, as and when necessary. But should we punish more? I asked. (thanks robinw), had he any parenting suggestions to pass on to us?(thanks robinw).The leader said no. He knew we had been backing up his decisions at home for ages and he said (with a bitter laugh) that it hadn't worked so far.
Having reached a stalemate on parental involvment, I asked the cub leader how he and other leaders warn ds about exclusion, and whether ds alone gets excluded or singled out generally, talking through ds's version of the bike badge day. (thanks custardo and others) The leader said it was his decision alone to ban ds from camp, nothing to do with the bike badge day. OK, fair enough, I must have misunderstood. He did say that ds's name does crop up amongst leaders, just becasue he can be so naughty and yes, there is nervousness about including him in things and yes, it can seem he is singled out, but then some of the other boys feel my ds gets off lightly and that they are singled out too (oh, the joys of being a cub leader!)
I asked how aware is ds made of this (threat to exclude)? Now this is when the story diverges. According to the cub leader, ds (and any other boys) are given plenty of warnings. Ds had been warned that he might miss the camp if he did not behave. According to ds, he did get a warning about not going to camp at the end of the last meeting while he was sitting apart. He remained sitting apart till I collected him 15 minutes later. I was then told ds wouldn't be going to camp. ie ds was warned but had no time to improve his behaviour. So not fair on the surface. I asked ds if he had had any other warnings about camp - after some probing he said not going to camp had been mentioned as a general warning to groups of boys if they played up, but no specific warnings to him as in 'ds if you don't stop running around the hall and kicking that football right now, you will not be going to camp.' I don't know who is right, ds or cub leader, but certainluy think ds is not sufficiently aware of warnings. When a teacher or I warn ds, he knows he has been warned, no mistake. This might need clarifying with the cub leader.
One of my son's major failings is not being able to work well in groups. Since I don't have a gaggle of 8 year olds to look after (thankfully), I don't exactly know what he does, so can't offer insight. I sugggested the leader spoke to his teacher about this, she copes somehow and ds joins in with group work better, I hear. He still has to work alone at times, though, and when he does, he completes the task he is set. I suggested that ds works alone at cubs, too, but the leader says this is not possible - all activities are team based.
Apart from putting the cub leader in contact with my son's teacher, I don't think there's more I can do.
So I told the cub leader that while I and dh would make an increased effort to support cubs generally, I would be leaving the cub discipline decisons to him and my ds. (thanks and thanks again scummy). As long as things are done fairly (thanks custardo) I would not intervene. I will not be asking how my son behaved after each session, though the leader can phone me up at any time if he wants to and I have an open ear for my son. I will not be disciplining my son at home for being bad in cubs, but neither will I persuade him to stay or query fair discipline procedure, even if it means he gets expelled. The leader, bless him, said he had never thought of expelling my ds.
I think the leader was a bit surprised at my decision - I think he had me down as a very involved mother - but I honestly don't see what else dh or I can do.
The cub leader is young, it's his first pack and he has been leading for just over a year. Sadly it's his relative inexperience versus my son's challenging behaviour. Just for the record, my son attended Beavers for two years without being excluded once. The leader was very experienced and she had a weekly rota of parents who helped. Personally I think this cub leader should set up a rota, too. Many parents can give the odd week of help even if they can't go regularly. The cub leader does have a proper helper, but says there is still a supervision problem centered around my son and a few others. Even if my son and the others left the pack, some bigger, badder and even meaner boys could join, so the problem won't be solved by exclusion. But I've offered my help, made my suggestions, even mentioned having a weekly parents rota - all met with a 'no', so what more to do?
reading the last few messages I have still got more things to add but am in a rush now so will stop.