Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Is 7 too young for a Brownies residential trip?

44 replies

Greenwriter76 · Yesterday 14:40

My DD turned 7 in March and moved up from Rainbows to Brownies. 2 sessions so far and she’s enjoying it. Had an email from Brownies today saying there will be a residential trip 2 days / 3 nights at an activity centre roughly an hour away.
DD has only ever stayed at grandparents overnight without me / us. I feel like she’s too young to stay away alone.
Thoughts?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
CurlsLDN · Yesterday 17:22

I’m a cubs leader, so boys and girls of a similar age.

we offer a 2 night camp or trip every year. About 2/3rds of the pack of attend - we never expect everyone to come.

although absolutely everyone is welcome, we don’t expect the newest/youngest to come, as it’s normal for some not to be ready. If they stay with cubs they will have the same opportunity next year and maybe the year after, depending when they move up to scouts (where they’ll have even more opportunity!)

so I would say if she wants to go and you want her to go then she should - she will be fine and will have a brilliant time. But if she or you feel it’s not right for her just now that’s absolutely fine, she can go next time (if she wants!)

MrsFionaCharming · Yesterday 17:23

As a Guide leader, I’ve had Guides come for just the first night of a residential if it’s their first one, so you could ask the Brownie leaders if that was possible.

I’ve also had nervous guides sign up for just the one night, then had their parents drop off extra kit so they can stay longer.

Natsku · Yesterday 17:31

See how she feels closer to the time but generally speaking not too young.
DS had his first camp with Scouts last autumn when he was 7 and had a blast, even took his turn keeping fire watch during the night (they all slept in a big tent with a wood burner for warmth as it was quite cold). He's going on a big camp with thousands of other Scouts this summer (which I'm a bit anxious about tbh but his sister did the same at the same age and everything was fine apart from coming home with feet totally black with dirt as she went barefoot everywhere)

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Formby · Yesterday 17:34

I was a Brownie leader and took 7 year olds on holiday many times. Maybe you ask if she can go for a day
visit if she’s uncertain and you take her and pick her up. That way she can decide if she would like to go next time. Or ask the leader if they have any single overnight sleepovers coming up.

FlippyKiYayFlippyFlipper · Yesterday 17:36

GrueyTwoey · Yesterday 16:45

Hell no, their safeguarding is non existent.

This. I wouldn’t be satisfied ‘girl’ guiding could ensure my daughters safety.

RedToothBrush · Yesterday 17:51

Of course it's not too young! Why would there be school residentials and cub/brownie camps if it wasn't?!

Your own child may not be ready but that's a different matter and generally it says as much about the parents as the kids in half those cases.

harrietm87 · Yesterday 18:18

RedToothBrush · Yesterday 17:51

Of course it's not too young! Why would there be school residentials and cub/brownie camps if it wasn't?!

Your own child may not be ready but that's a different matter and generally it says as much about the parents as the kids in half those cases.

Bit of a weird response…it obviously is too young for some children. And tbh if a parent has concerns these are completely valid too - not sure why you would seemingly dismiss these.

Having been a volunteer leader at my child’s beavers sessions and seen the level of safeguarding firsthand (eg children getting lost in the Forest and missed off a headcount, a child getting pushed fully clothed into a lake) I wouldn’t blindly rush to send my very young child to something like this simply because the beaver leaders have decided it’s appropriate for him to do. It’s all very context dependent.

LemonTyger · Yesterday 19:05

Not unless I knew the leader fairly well. At my unit, most of the Brownies don’t start doing these sorts of things until 9/10, some wait until Guides for the overnight trips! You don’t usually get 7 year olds unless a younger sister of an older Brownie or know leader fairly well. Could be different in different units of course.

mindutopia · Yesterday 19:43

Mine did Beavers camp at 6. It totally depends on the child. He needed some reassurance, but once he was there, he had the best time. But there are 12 year olds to anxious to go on the Y6 residential (also there are 45 year olds too anxious to let their 12 year olds go on the Y6 residential 🙄). They can absolutely be ready, but totally depends on the child. I personally would say that toileting independence and if they are dry at night would be a big deciding factor at that age.

Skybluetoo · Yesterday 19:51

I would let my DD attend if it was just her group, with leaders I trust. Definitely not if numerous other groups with unknown adults.

Needspaceforlego · Yesterday 19:54

I don't think its too young.
One of the things Brownies do is teach indepence.

GuidingSpirit · Yesterday 19:58

Im another brownie leader and an option we offer for the very young / new ones is just to do one night. You would come and collect just before bed on the second day. As pp have said, its so child dependent, there is no right or wrong answer. Are there any school friends in her group? That's usually another favour in going as if there is a few of them that know each other outside Brownies, it can help to settle any nerves.

ShetlandishMum · Yesterday 20:09

GrueyTwoey · Yesterday 16:45

Hell no, their safeguarding is non existent.

My daughter went from she was 5 with rainbows. The leaders did it textbook.

FlippyKiYayFlippyFlipper · Yesterday 20:48

ShetlandishMum · Yesterday 20:09

My daughter went from she was 5 with rainbows. The leaders did it textbook.

Well they still aren’t complying with the Supreme Court ruling so you can’t be sure men and boys weren’t around your daughter without your knowledge.

https://www.gbnews.com/news/girlguiding-trans-supreme-court-gender-ruling

Girlguiding REFUSES to accept Supreme Court gender ruling with boys 'allowed to use female camp rooms and toilets without the knowledge of parents'

The charity, the UK's largest girl-only youth organisation, has allegedly told volunteers that they should sideline the judgement

https://www.gbnews.com/news/girlguiding-trans-supreme-court-gender-ruling

Needspaceforlego · Today 00:54

Actually GG have said all trans must leave by 6th Sept.

FlippyKiYayFlippyFlipper · Today 07:17

Needspaceforlego · Today 00:54

Actually GG have said all trans must leave by 6th Sept.

I’m well aware. But that’s 17 months after the law was clarified.

Why didn’t guiding want to protect spaces for female children immediately?

the poster claimed ‘textbook’ safeguarding was in place when her daughter went on a residential. If it was within the last 12 months there were policies in place that were not lawful so you can’t argue it was ‘textbook’.

AgnesMcDoo · Today 07:26

I’ve taken Beavers aged 6 and 7 away regularly in camps staying in tents or indoor accommodation.

95% of them love it and have a wonderful experience.

There occasionally a child who struggles and who we have to send home. They are usually those who’ve never been away from home before.

As long as your child has been fine staying with grandparents then she should be fine.

if she wants to go - let her. She will have the best time.

Walkerzoo · Today 07:28

I remember having same worries

Mine ended up going and loved it!

One forgot a special teddy for bed and another boy had taken 3 and loaned her one of his. Years later she still hasn't forgotten that kindness.

Needspaceforlego · Today 09:33

FlippyKiYayFlippyFlipper · Today 07:17

I’m well aware. But that’s 17 months after the law was clarified.

Why didn’t guiding want to protect spaces for female children immediately?

the poster claimed ‘textbook’ safeguarding was in place when her daughter went on a residential. If it was within the last 12 months there were policies in place that were not lawful so you can’t argue it was ‘textbook’.

Maybe, but you know what thousands of women give up their time to support girls. And hundreds walked away because of the trans policies.

There's no indication that this girls group has a trans leader or trans girls. The organisation has finally got themselves sorted at the top. And the trip isn't until after the policy change.

So why keep putting the knife in to undo the voluntary work of thousands of women?

BTW I have zero connection to GG past or present, but I don't want to see girls miss out or women be pulled down.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread