Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Would you wean early in 99th percentile?

45 replies

Meeting · 05/01/2026 12:01

My baby is just over 4 months old and has been in the 99th percentile since birth. Do I still need to wait until 6 months to wean or could I start early? He's showing all the signs of readiness already.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
LoveSandbanks · 05/01/2026 20:41

If your child is on the 99th centile with what your doing now there doesn't seem to be a justification for early weaning.

I had big babies, breastfed exclusively and grew at a rate of knots. Baby one was introduced to solids at around 6 months but showed no interest until 2 YEARS! He was almost exclusively breastfed until 2.

When infants are ready to wean, they'll put food in their mouths!

Baby two was also exclusively breastfed but lunged forward at 5 months of age and took food off my plate. It was in his mouth before I could react! If they're interested

Both were later diagnosed with autism btw 😃

ToKittyornottoKitty · 05/01/2026 20:42

Iloveeverycat · 05/01/2026 20:40

There is a hierarchy of "best" for premature and sick babies;

  1. their mothers breastmilk
  2. donor breastmilk
  3. formula
You can not tell which children have been formula fed or breast fed there is no difference between them.
Edited

Irrelevant though as I was responding to a poster who said formula was less healthy than purées for her 5 month old

LoveSandbanks · 05/01/2026 20:51

Iloveeverycat · 05/01/2026 20:40

There is a hierarchy of "best" for premature and sick babies;

  1. their mothers breastmilk
  2. donor breastmilk
  3. formula
You can not tell which children have been formula fed or breast fed there is no difference between them.
Edited

In very premature or very sick children, it can be the difference between their survival or not. That's why there's a hierarchy.

Breastfed children are shown, statistically, to get less infections and need less antibiotics.

Can we tell the difference 10, 15 years later. I don't know, what are we looking for, who is in the control group? There are so many variables in childhood outcomes that it's likely impossible to tell but the facts remain that "breast is best". As I said, formula is fine and breastfeeding your child doesn't make you mother superior. I know mothers who will tell you that they breastfed through bleeding nipples. The abuse they handed out to their children just a few years later utterly negated that.

I was formula fed, as was my husband. We both have university degrees, live productive lives and are fit and healthy in our 50's.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Lamentingalways · 05/01/2026 20:52

Overstimulated · 05/01/2026 12:24

You don’t need to wait until 6 months, it’s around 6 months, if you baby is sitting unaided, has some level of hand eye coordination ect then you can start weaning them.

studies have proven is it dangerous to wean before 17 weeks. Studies have proven that it is not dangerous to wean after 17 weeks.

The guidance for weaning around 6 months is aimed at and to encourage exclusive breastfeeding. It’s also curated by the WHO organisation which are responsible for the guidance worldwide (hence the name) so 6 months is guidance based on third world countries where water isn’t clean therefore isn’t safe to be digested by a child much younger than 6 months.

If you feel your child would
enjoy complimentary foods, and would still drink the recommended amount of milk/formula for their age then you can absolutely give them some foods to enjoy. But don’t necessarily aim to replace milk until closer to 6 months.

Very sensible answer.

Meeting · 05/01/2026 20:59

LoveSandbanks · 05/01/2026 20:51

In very premature or very sick children, it can be the difference between their survival or not. That's why there's a hierarchy.

Breastfed children are shown, statistically, to get less infections and need less antibiotics.

Can we tell the difference 10, 15 years later. I don't know, what are we looking for, who is in the control group? There are so many variables in childhood outcomes that it's likely impossible to tell but the facts remain that "breast is best". As I said, formula is fine and breastfeeding your child doesn't make you mother superior. I know mothers who will tell you that they breastfed through bleeding nipples. The abuse they handed out to their children just a few years later utterly negated that.

I was formula fed, as was my husband. We both have university degrees, live productive lives and are fit and healthy in our 50's.

You do realise my thread is nothing to do with BF Vs formula?

OP posts:
ToKittyornottoKitty · 05/01/2026 21:36

LoveSandbanks · 05/01/2026 20:51

In very premature or very sick children, it can be the difference between their survival or not. That's why there's a hierarchy.

Breastfed children are shown, statistically, to get less infections and need less antibiotics.

Can we tell the difference 10, 15 years later. I don't know, what are we looking for, who is in the control group? There are so many variables in childhood outcomes that it's likely impossible to tell but the facts remain that "breast is best". As I said, formula is fine and breastfeeding your child doesn't make you mother superior. I know mothers who will tell you that they breastfed through bleeding nipples. The abuse they handed out to their children just a few years later utterly negated that.

I was formula fed, as was my husband. We both have university degrees, live productive lives and are fit and healthy in our 50's.

Why are you still posting about this? This isn’t a formula vs breast feeding thread. I was responding to someone saying formula was less healthy than purées, not that you bothered reading that.

Tammygirl12 · 05/01/2026 21:38

ToKittyornottoKitty · 05/01/2026 12:31

Why are you claiming that formula is less healthy? Do you have any evidence of this?

Google it. It’s fact that formula is less healthy

Knittedanimal · 05/01/2026 21:39

I think we started my walloper on baby porridge/banana at around 4 months, under my mum's advice. She was horribly constipated as a recall....but i may have misremembered the timing.

ToKittyornottoKitty · 05/01/2026 21:41

Tammygirl12 · 05/01/2026 21:38

Google it. It’s fact that formula is less healthy

Edited

I googled it, it didn’t state that formula was less healthy than purées for a 5 month old, feel free to link.

lljkk · 05/01/2026 21:41

A baby who is thriving on milk feeds so why would you move to solids unless you want them to thrive less?

Tammygirl12 · 05/01/2026 21:44

ToKittyornottoKitty · 05/01/2026 21:41

I googled it, it didn’t state that formula was less healthy than purées for a 5 month old, feel free to link.

My mistake. I completely read that as formula less healthy than breast milk. That shows me to be more careful with skim reading - apologies

Skybluepinky · 05/01/2026 22:16

Not unless a specialist tells you to.

Natsku · 06/01/2026 04:31

ToKittyornottoKitty · 05/01/2026 20:42

Irrelevant though as I was responding to a poster who said formula was less healthy than purées for her 5 month old

Not to say formula is less healthy or anything like that but the guidance in my country is that if a breastfed baby is hungrier than the breastmilk they are getting then they should be weaned on the earlier side of 4-6 months rather than introducing formula top ups.

Natsku · 06/01/2026 04:32

ToKittyornottoKitty · 05/01/2026 12:37

That is not the guidance

Its the guidance in countries that follow evidence

Fishingboatbobbingnight · 06/01/2026 05:18

I weaned my babies when I thought they were ready. That varied between 18 weeks and 22 weeks depending on the child’s interests. All bf until 18 months/2yrs.

All had excellent adventurous appetites and no allergies or digestive issues.

Dgll · 06/01/2026 06:10

I started weaning mine at around 4 -5 months (in a small way) because they started taking an interest and were getting hungrier. They were still mainly breast fed. It was a very gradual shift towards solids so I'm not sure why people are saying it is hard work or a faff. It isn't as you have to start serving them a 3 course meal 3 times a day.

Natsku · 06/01/2026 06:27

Dgll · 06/01/2026 06:10

I started weaning mine at around 4 -5 months (in a small way) because they started taking an interest and were getting hungrier. They were still mainly breast fed. It was a very gradual shift towards solids so I'm not sure why people are saying it is hard work or a faff. It isn't as you have to start serving them a 3 course meal 3 times a day.

Yeah they're only supposed to have small tastes after milk feeds to begin with, not meals and not replacing milk feeds.

Whenlifegiveslemons · 07/01/2026 23:03

Weaning at 6 months is when the baby's organs are ready for food, that's what the HV told me years ago. Doing it early isn't a good idea for any reason, babies aren't ready for it yet.

Natsku · 08/01/2026 07:57

Your hv was going on the information at the time, now we know more and know that weaning between 4 and 6 months can reduce allergies, and that waiting until 6 months increases the risk of anaemia in breastfed babies.

TammySue · 08/01/2026 08:03

I don’t understand what weight has to do with it.
Breast milk / formula are both very calorie dense. Unless you’re planning on weaning onto double cream I don’t see how filling their tummy with veg purée is going to help?
That sounds more like a diet than anything.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread