Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Any legal professionals around? How likely is the court to grant this?

46 replies

questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 06:18

Ex husband has been fighting for a week on and week off arrangement with our children.

I am strongly opposed to this for 2 main reasons:

  1. The youngest has just turned 5 and cries every time she has to go to her dad’s and has to be pulled off me by him when I drop her off. Even the eldest struggles sometimes. I feel a week is a long time.
  2. I am self employed and it will massively affect my ability to financially support myself and the children, especially during school holidays.

Ex husband is now saying if I don’t agree by a certain date we are going to court.

How likely is it that a court will agree with him?

OP posts:
BasicBrumble · 30/10/2025 09:48

TheBlueHotel · 30/10/2025 08:05

Why can't you use childcare?

Week on week off childcare is not easy to find. They may expect a full time place to be held and paid for

questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 11:24

DelphiniumBlue · 30/10/2025 09:44

I don’t see why Ex’s religious values would be more important than OPs ability to work consistently. I’m wondering if H is using this so that he doesn’t have to pay, whereas in fact with such a big financial discrepancy it may be the case that he doesn’t need to pay . OP, don’t know the rules on this but you should investigate the CMS aspect.
I Think the fact that a 5 year old struggles being away from their mum for a week at a time IS an important factor, and she might well find it easier to be separated for a shorter amount of time. Ex’s demands are to benefit him, and he doesn’t seem to be putting the children’s needs first. It is his wants that are the basis of his demands, his religious views which he is seeking to impose, against the wishes of OPs atheism. Atheism is a valid position OP, reading between the lines it sounds as if he has implied that your views are of less importance than his. You don’t have to justify atheism by adding that you have good values.
OP, I think you need legal advice. Maybe someone here can signpost you to an organisation where you can get some for free, maybe Citizens Advice might be a starting point?

Thank you, this is very much how I feel.

OP posts:
questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 11:26

BasicBrumble · 30/10/2025 09:48

Week on week off childcare is not easy to find. They may expect a full time place to be held and paid for

This exactly. I also live alone but he had someone move in with him very quickly after I left and so has reliable childcare. He also has a job that he can do from home while the children are around. I work from home but I can’t have the children in the house while I do it.

OP posts:

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Flibbertyfloo · 30/10/2025 11:48

If I were you I would let him take it to court. I'd do my utmost to appear super reasonable to the judge. Do not mention religion. Keep it very practical. You have limited financial resources and you are self employed. You absolutely support the children having time with their father, but the proposed arrangements would cause great financial difficulty to you and therefore be detrimental to the children.

Gather as much evidence as you can to support this. E.g. months of records as to the days and times you work. Information supporting why you can't do that one week on one week off. Eg. If you are a personal trainer find studies supporting the important of regular weekly sessions. If you have any particularly loyal and friendly clients would they write letters explaining they'd sadly have to go elsewhere if you could only do evey other week? Email local childcare providers to ask about week on/week off childcare and keep the responses. Gather everything you possibly can to demonstrate that you are not being unreasonable, but that it is the practical reality of your financial situation.

TheBlueHotel · 30/10/2025 12:19

DelphiniumBlue · 30/10/2025 09:44

I don’t see why Ex’s religious values would be more important than OPs ability to work consistently. I’m wondering if H is using this so that he doesn’t have to pay, whereas in fact with such a big financial discrepancy it may be the case that he doesn’t need to pay . OP, don’t know the rules on this but you should investigate the CMS aspect.
I Think the fact that a 5 year old struggles being away from their mum for a week at a time IS an important factor, and she might well find it easier to be separated for a shorter amount of time. Ex’s demands are to benefit him, and he doesn’t seem to be putting the children’s needs first. It is his wants that are the basis of his demands, his religious views which he is seeking to impose, against the wishes of OPs atheism. Atheism is a valid position OP, reading between the lines it sounds as if he has implied that your views are of less importance than his. You don’t have to justify atheism by adding that you have good values.
OP, I think you need legal advice. Maybe someone here can signpost you to an organisation where you can get some for free, maybe Citizens Advice might be a starting point?

Unfortunately work commitments are never going to be the primary consideration when it comes to shared care arrangements. If OP doesn't support week on week off then she should consider 4:3 3:4.
Neither parent's views on religion are more important than the other's.

skkyelark · 30/10/2025 12:49

I've known people to do something like:

Parent 1: Monday school/nursery pickup to school/nursery drop off Wednesday morning
Parent 2: Wednesday school/nursery pickup Friday drop-off
Alternating: Friday pick up to Monday drop off

That gives 50-50 with a consistent pattern of days so you'd know which days of the week you'd have clear to work and avoids any full weeks (except for holidays) away from either parent. It also has relatively few transitions and (in term time), always at school/nursery, so not a direct transition from one parent to the other. Could you argue for something like that?

questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 12:50

skkyelark · 30/10/2025 12:49

I've known people to do something like:

Parent 1: Monday school/nursery pickup to school/nursery drop off Wednesday morning
Parent 2: Wednesday school/nursery pickup Friday drop-off
Alternating: Friday pick up to Monday drop off

That gives 50-50 with a consistent pattern of days so you'd know which days of the week you'd have clear to work and avoids any full weeks (except for holidays) away from either parent. It also has relatively few transitions and (in term time), always at school/nursery, so not a direct transition from one parent to the other. Could you argue for something like that?

This is essentially what we do now.

OP posts:
skkyelark · 30/10/2025 12:54

I think that could help your case, as I think courts usually want a good reason to vary the status quo if the status quo is working reasonably well. If the main problem is the five year old struggling with transitions and/or missing you, then longer apart isn't going to help with the missing, and there are other things you can do to work on the transitions. Not a legal professional, however.

mindutopia · 30/10/2025 17:24

Nothing is going to be more off putting to children than pushy religious dad. Ultimately, that’s going to work in your favour because they will lean towards you as they get older.

From a childcare perspective, working with children around all week, even if he thinks he can do it, is far from ideal. I assume he is self-employed? Because no employer is going to be happy about that.

But the reality is that most people who work have to sort out childcare and most people who work have to work consistent hours week after week. You need to build that into your business plan and now is a good time to start doing it because it will work to your advantage in the longer term.

questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 18:28

Thank you everyone

OP posts:
VikaOlson · 30/10/2025 18:33

TheBlueHotel · 30/10/2025 08:05

Why can't you use childcare?

What kind of childcare would be available?

DontGoChasinWaterfalls · 30/10/2025 18:35

Could you do 5/5/2/2?

CryMyEyesViolet · 30/10/2025 18:36

Mumofoneandone · 30/10/2025 07:46

I think the religious instruction is of concern. (And I have a faith) Is his pushing for more time to 'indoctrinate', particularly when they are so young actually more likely to harm them? He can easily chat about his faith whenever he's with them....
Or is he pushing for 50/50 to avoid maintenance but things a comment about religious teaching sounds better?
For you, if the time split is working (or not, if your 5 year old is deeply unhappy) then it maybe worth letting your ex take you to court.
I would get some legal input though, to ensure you are arguing what is in the best interest if your children.
It might also be worth trying to get to the bottom of what your daughter doesn't like about her dad's. Wonder if the religious side is off-putting. Possibly ask the school to see if her behaviour is different when she's with her dad or with you. Get the school on board with the set up, as they can be a valuable independent witness to what's happening.

Edited

Is it a concern? Passing religion onto you children is an age old tradition and I’d imagine is how the vast majority of religion is passed on.

Do you get equally concerned when children are baptised or sent to faith schools?

IntrinsicWorth · 30/10/2025 18:43

I think the religion argument is a no go unless he is coercively controlling or using religion to abuse the children. For wrong or for right, people can indoctrinate their kids as they see fit.

It sounds a bit like he might be trying to change contact patterns to cause maximum inconvenience to you. Either that or he genuinely believes fewer transitions are best for the kids. Or he wants uninterrupted weeks wotu the new partner to eg go on holidays.

I think I’d just say “no”. Let him take you to courts the worst that will happen is the court will order WOWO and that won’t happen quickly.

knowingmekniwingyou · 30/10/2025 18:46

questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 06:36

Yes he’s an ok parent. Arrangement at the moment is almost 50:50, there’s only 1 day in it.

The reason he’s pressing for the change is for value/religious reasons. He believes it’s his duty to instil a particular religion into the children and I am an atheist (an atheist with good values I might add). He believes that having longer stretches of time with them will enable him to do this.

there is also a huge resource/financial disparity between us.

if it goes to court I will be representing myself, he will have the best solicitor going.

Is he Muslim

questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 18:49

DontGoChasinWaterfalls · 30/10/2025 18:35

Could you do 5/5/2/2?

With my work I need regularity so clients can have the same time every week if necessary

OP posts:
questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 18:52

IntrinsicWorth · 30/10/2025 18:43

I think the religion argument is a no go unless he is coercively controlling or using religion to abuse the children. For wrong or for right, people can indoctrinate their kids as they see fit.

It sounds a bit like he might be trying to change contact patterns to cause maximum inconvenience to you. Either that or he genuinely believes fewer transitions are best for the kids. Or he wants uninterrupted weeks wotu the new partner to eg go on holidays.

I think I’d just say “no”. Let him take you to courts the worst that will happen is the court will order WOWO and that won’t happen quickly.

yes, it does feel like there is some kind of vindictiveness involved, because his wanting this so strongly doesn’t seem to make much sense. He is very angry

OP posts:
questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 18:52

knowingmekniwingyou · 30/10/2025 18:46

Is he Muslim

No, it’s not Islam

OP posts:
knowingmekniwingyou · 30/10/2025 18:54

questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 18:52

No, it’s not Islam

So he is Muslim

questionaboutson · 30/10/2025 18:55

knowingmekniwingyou · 30/10/2025 18:54

So he is Muslim

Nope, not Muslim

OP posts:
IntrinsicWorth · 30/10/2025 19:09

Ok so if you suspect the motive is sheer spite, then I definitely would not agree to this. Let him persuade the court that it is in the best interests of the children. That is the legal test.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page