Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Other subjects

Signet rings - someone enlighten me pls

31 replies

lostinparis · 06/08/2004 15:19

Over the last years I have noticed more and more people (both men and women) sprouting signet rings on their little fingers (I think with crests on them). Now some of them come from old families so I take it that they may have some reason (like Prince Charles) to wear a signet ring - although is it meant to be some sort of class signal? Some of them do not - are they just trying to look like they come from old families? + I used to think that signet rings were the domain of Ratners jewellery shops? Basically - can someone enlighten me about signet rings? + do they fool anyone?/are they for real or is it a bit like paying for a family coat of arms at the tube station?

OP posts:
JoeLilyAlicesDad · 14/10/2014 12:28

To answer the question at the start, the only guidance which seems constant is that the signet ring is worn on the little finger, if deeply engraved (in reverse) for imprint it should be facing you, if engraved to read, facing away from you. It is usually worn on the non-dominant hand; none of these are rules, other than borne of everyday functionality. More signet rings are appearing on the dominant hand, which is fine, for all the good reasons given in the threads above.

Signet rings are merely the throwback to sealing letters with wax, which was stamped by the sender firstly to seal it, showing from whom the letter came and secondly to avoid anyone tampering with the letter. Engraved initials on rings serve the same purpose, making a wax stamp with the initials of the sender. The crests are usually passed down through the family, as it is very rare these days to make a new family coat of arms.

Lots of clubs, societies and alumni are now offering signet rings as a discrete way of showing support, removing the snobbery factor, which is no bad thing either.

AdrianD · 14/02/2015 13:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

HoppityVoosh · 14/02/2015 14:06

I wondered why I couldn't laugh at the argos rings then realised this thread is 11 FUCKING YEARS OLD.

AdrianD · 14/02/2015 14:12

It’s not all about the snob value! – These rings are worn by old school aristocracy, true, but more often than not its ordinary folk, people from regular backgrounds celebrating their lineage - and that doesn’t mean a noble bloodline back to the 14th century! It can just mean wearing something attractive that represents your identity, parents or grandparents.

If you like the look of a crest ring and fancy making a purchase there are differences / important faux pas to avoid:

These rings depict crests. The crest is part of a coat of arms - the wearing of the crest, seal engraved on a ring, is traditionally associated with English, Scottish, and Welsh families. Often, but not always, the ring is worn on the little finger.

These rings show the full coat of arms. These more elaborate designs are traditionally worn by continental European families, requiring a bigger signet ring head and as such worn on the ring finger as opposed to the little finger. Also have become v. popular with Americans!

Coats of arms and crests are awarded to individuals - their descendants are ‘entitled’ to ‘bear’ these arms. So if you are looking to have a signet ring engraved with a crest, unless you are sure of your lineage, its best to go for the oldest registered crest of that particular name. The crest you choose may not be your crest in the true sense - but one that has become associated with your family name and has come to represent that name over time. Of course the crest you choose may just be one you like the look of or that has some other resonance with you. Some names are represented by dozens of different crests, some relevant to specific individuals some associated with different areas. A good herald or crest ring supplier will be able to advise you; referring to publications such as ‘Fairbairn’s Book of Crests’ or ‘Burkes General Armoury’. If they are not familiar with these publications you should seek advice elsewhere.

With Scottish clan rings the heraldry is much more straight forward: anyone with that clan name or a name associated with that clan is entitled to bear the clan badge. Usually one clan badge for every name (with one or two exceptions). The clan badge is the crest surrounded by a belt and garter which bears the clan motto.

In short there is no heraldry police that will arrest you for wearing the wrong ring, but it’s always good to make an informed choice – whether that is a seal engraved ring that depicts your family crest or represents your family or just a design you happen to like! :)

RevHarry · 28/08/2016 12:50

Wear your signet proudly on whichever finger. It is no kess vital to a new wearer than it is for the Prince of Wales. You English hate yourselves too much sometimes...meanness of spirit. The secret of the nobility signet is they wear whatever, whenever, wherever! The people who have posted here are woefully uneducated.

BombadierFritz · 28/08/2016 12:55

haha
changing demographic on mumsnet illustrated by this thread perhaps

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread